Comparison · QB Control vs. Lucullus PIMS
QB Control vs Lucullus PIMS Comparison
At a glance
| Dimension | QB Control | Lucullus PIMS |
|---|---|---|
| Software platform | ◆ Browser-based (any modern browser) | Windows desktop client-server |
| Database | ◆ Local on QB Edge, no external DB | Oracle (XE or full enterprise) |
| Hardware | 20+ purpose-built PoE modules | Third-party bioreactors + controllers |
| Device integration | ◆ Auto-discovery + OPC-UA connector | Custom driver development per device |
| Client install | ◆ None (any browser) | Windows app + Oracle client |
| IT infrastructure | ◆ QB Edge + PoE cabling | Windows Server, Oracle DB, drivers |
Table of Contents
- Executive Summary
- Platform Philosophy
- Architecture & Hardware
- Parallel Processing
- Multi-Vendor Integration
- Software Module Comparison
- Services Catalog & Rapid Deployment
- Recipe Engine
- Regulatory Compliance
- Pricing, Licensing & TCO
- Industry Fit Analysis
- What QB Control Can Replace
- Where QB Control Creates Superior Value
- Gaps & Limitations
- Migration & Replacement Scenarios
- Competitive Positioning Strategy
- Feature-by-Feature Matrix
Appendices — Summary Scores by Category · Sources
1. Executive Summary
The Core Argument
Securecell’s Lucullus PIMS (Process Information Management System) is the bioprocess industry’s most established software-only data-integration and process-control layer — over 25 years of continuous development, deep multi-vendor connectivity, mature design-of-experiments (DoE) integration, sample and media management, and enterprise-scale data warehousing on an Oracle database. QB Control is a SCADA-class, browser-based platform purpose-built for liquid-handling bioprocessing, combining co-engineered hardware (QB Modules) and software with ~40 pre-built bioprocess services, a visual recipe engine, native sensors, and built-in compliance modules. It deploys both on QB Edge (benchtop QB Modules) and on a standard industrial PC driving stainless-steel, PLC-based systems via OPC-UA.
The two products solve different problems. Lucullus is a middleware data layer that sits on top of existing third-party bioreactors and controllers — its value is connecting to everything, centralizing the data, and enabling cross-experiment analysis. It owns no process hardware and depends on driver development for each new device. QB Control ships the bioprocess application and the hardware already built — turnkey from the bench, with an OPC-UA path that also lets it monitor and control third-party OPC-UA equipment. The comparison is most relevant in lab-to-pilot bioprocessing (150 mL – 50 L benchtop, plus stainless-steel pilot/production via PLC), where Lucullus’s infrastructure overhead becomes a burden and QB Control delivers a right-sized, unified alternative.
Key Finding
QB Control does not replace Lucullus PIMS in all scenarios. It replaces Lucullus in specific, high-value segments where Lucullus’s Oracle dependency, driver-development cycle, integrator reliance, and software-only architecture create friction. With the industrial-PC deployment path and the OPC-UA connector, QB Control’s addressable footprint extends from greenfield benchtop labs up into stainless-steel pilot cells and retrofitted legacy hardware. Lucullus retains a genuine lead in cross-experiment analytics, DoE, established multi-vendor breadth, and enterprise multi-site data harmonization. The sweet spot for QB Control as a Lucullus alternative is:
| Scenario | QB Control Replaces Lucullus? | Value Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Greenfield lab (1–12 bioreactors) | ✅ Full replacement | Unified hardware + software, days vs. weeks setup |
| Academic / teaching lab | ✅ Full replacement | Zero IT overhead, no Oracle, browser UI |
| Small R&D lab (1–6 bioreactors) | ✅ Strong replacement | Turnkey control, perpetual license, no DBA |
| Pilot scale (10–50 L, new build) | ✅ Strong replacement | One vendor, lower TCO, native modules |
| Retrofit of OPC-UA-enabled bioreactors | ✅ Strong replacement | OPC-UA connector controls Sartorius, etc. |
| Stainless-steel pilot cell with PLC | ✅ Strong replacement (new) | Industrial-PC deployment + OPC-UA |
| Adding vessels to an existing Lucullus lab | ⚠️ Partial / complementary | QB for new standalone vessels; Lucullus keeps data continuity |
| DoE-heavy process development | ❌ Not a replacement | Lucullus native DoE integration required |
| Enterprise multi-site data harmonization | ❌ Not a replacement | Centralized Oracle warehouse required |
2. Platform Philosophy
Fundamental Architecture Difference
| Dimension | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| Product Category | Software-only PIMS / process-control layer | SCADA-class browser-based hardware+software platform |
| Design Philosophy | Connect to everything, centralize all data | Hardware and software designed as one system |
| Target Scale | Lab to enterprise (vendor-dependent) | Lab-to-pilot (150 mL – 50 L benchtop); stainless-steel pilot/production via PLC + OPC-UA |
| Approach to Hardware | None — connects to 3rd-party bioreactors via drivers | Own modular hardware (QB Modules) + open sensors; or existing PLCs (Wago/Siemens/Beckhoff) |
| Software Delivery | Windows desktop client-server application | Browser-based (any device, any OS) |
| Deployment Host | Windows / Windows Server + Oracle DB | QB Edge for benchtop or standard industrial PC for PLC-based stainless steel |
| Database | Oracle (XE standalone → full Oracle enterprise) | Embedded data store on the deployment host — no external DB |
| Configuration Model | Per-device driver + script/form-based recipes | Visual no-code flow + recipe designer |
| Deployment Time | Weeks (Oracle, drivers, integrator) | Days (plug-and-play / OPC-UA mapping) |
| Vendor Strategy | Vendor-agnostic via drivers (integrator-led) | Open ecosystem (no lock-in) + native modules |
| GAMP Classification | Category 5 (custom, device-specific drivers) | Category 4 (configurable software) |
The “Universal Translator” Problem
Lucullus was born from a real need: unify data from heterogeneous bioprocess equipment so scientists can compare runs across vessels, scales, and vendors. Its philosophy — connect to everything, centralize all data, enable cross-experiment analysis — assumes the lab already owns bioreactors (Sartorius, Getinge/Applikon, Eppendorf, Infors, etc.) and needs a software layer to translate, monitor, and warehouse them. That makes Lucullus a powerful middleware platform, but it also makes every deployment dependent on:
- An Oracle database (XE for standalone, full Oracle for enterprise) with the licensing and administration that implies
- Custom driver development for each new device type (typically weeks per device)
- Windows workstations and servers, OPC gateways, and corporate IT governance
- A system integrator for setup, configuration, and validation
Lucullus is like a universal TV remote that can control any brand of TV — powerful, but it must be programmed for each new device, and it owns none of the hardware it commands. QB Control was designed with the opposite philosophy: hardware and software are one system. Every QB Module (pump, sensor, agitator, gas-flow controller, thermo unit, valve, scale) communicates natively with QB Control over PoE — no drivers to write, no Oracle to maintain, no integration project. And because QB Control also speaks OPC-UA (with a dedicated connector), it can reach beyond the QB ecosystem to monitor and control third-party OPC-UA equipment — controlling other brands when needed, while remaining turnkey for its own.
QB Control further provides centralized multi-processing: multiple processes run simultaneously from one host, each with its own auto-generated P&ID/HMI — no need to integrate data from separate controllers after the fact, which is precisely the problem Lucullus was built to solve.
3. Architecture & Hardware
Controller & Hardware Architecture
| Component | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| Software platform | Windows desktop application (client-server) | Browser-based (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari) |
| Central host | Windows / Windows Server + Oracle DB | QB Edge (runs QB Control locally) or industrial PC for PLC-based stainless-steel systems |
| Database | Oracle (XE standalone → full Oracle enterprise) | Embedded data store on the host — no external DB required |
| Hardware dependency | Third-party bioreactors + controllers | QB Modules (own PoE devices); or existing PLCs via OPC-UA |
| Controller | Existing bioreactor controllers (Getinge i-Control / ez-Control / my-Control, Sartorius, etc.) | QB Edge or industrial PC |
| I/O architecture | OPC / serial drivers to external controllers | Power-over-Ethernet (one cable = power + data per module); or PLC I/O via OPC-UA |
| Device discovery | Manual driver development / commissioning per device | Auto-discovery (plug-and-play) for QB Modules; OPC-UA mapping for third-party |
| Workstation requirement | Windows client + Oracle client per seat | Any device with a browser |
| Deployment editions | Standalone (up to 8 bioreactors), Client-Server, Enterprise (multi-site) | Single QB Edge (expandable via QB Switch); or industrial PC for PLC systems |
| Power architecture | Multiple UPS units, separate circuits | PoE — single cable per module, no external supplies |
| Wiring | Network (Oracle ↔ workstation), RS232/RS485 to controllers, custom adapters | Single Ethernet cable per module; or existing PLC field wiring |
QB Modules Hardware Ecosystem vs. Lucullus 3rd-Party Integration
Lucullus operates as software only and manufactures no process hardware. It connects to third-party bioreactor controllers, sensors, pumps, and analyzers through device-specific drivers — so every new device type requires Securecell (or the customer) to develop or commission a driver. QB Control supplies the hardware natively:
| Function | Lucullus Approach | QB Control Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Pumps | 3rd-party pumps via drivers (Ismatec, Cole-Parmer, etc.) | QB Pump (peristaltic 3-/4-roller, centrifugal) + QB Syringe Pump — native; SmartPump (OPC) for 3rd-party |
| Sensors | Hamilton / Mettler Toledo via vendor tools + drivers | QB Multisensor — up to 6 Hamilton / Mettler Toledo probes natively |
| Agitation | 3rd-party agitators via controller drivers | QB Agitator, QB Multiagitator (2 or 6 vessels) — native |
| Temperature | 3rd-party thermocontrollers via drivers | QB Thermo (heating/cooling, heating mats) — native |
| Gas Flow | 3rd-party MFCs via drivers | QB Gasflow (dual mass-flow controllers) — native |
| Valves | 3rd-party valves via controller drivers | QB Pinch Valve, QB Selector Valve (24 positions) — native |
| Scales | 3rd-party scales via serial drivers | QB Multiscale (up to 6 scales) — native |
| Foam Detection | External, vendor-dependent | QB Foam Sensor — optical, non-contact |
| Lighting | Not part of the Lucullus ecosystem | QB Light (LED control for photobioreactors) |
| Pressure | 3rd-party transmitters via drivers | QB Pressure Sensor (single-use IBP transducers) |
| Automated Sampling | Numera — Securecell’s companion sampling/sample-prep hardware | QB Syringe Pump + QB Selector Valve — native sampling service |
| Bioreactor vessels | 3rd-party (any vendor) | QB Tanks (1 L, 3 L, custom to ~10 L); stainless-steel via PLC |
Network & Infrastructure Requirements
| Requirement | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| Database administration | Oracle DBA required — licensing, backup/recovery, schema, query tuning | None — embedded data store, automatic backups |
| OS patching & updates | Monthly security patches, AV management across all client machines | Firmware updates via web UI (infrequent, non-disruptive) |
| OPC licensing & gateways | OPC server license + gateway maintenance + driver versioning | Native protocol support; no OPC-UA licensing |
| Network architecture | Corporate IT governance, VLANs, firewalls for DB access, VPN | Plug-and-play PoE switch + single Ethernet cable per module |
| IT staffing | Database admin (partial FTE) + systems admin + escalations | Minimal — device self-manages; browser access only |
| Backup & disaster recovery | Oracle DB backups, transaction logs, recovery testing | Scheduled/manual backup wizards + one-click restore |
| Remote monitoring | VPN tunneling, Windows RDP, firewall exceptions | Secure VPN with QR-code setup; HTTPS browser access |
| New device onboarding | Contact Securecell → custom driver development (weeks) | Auto-discovery in minutes; OPC-UA endpoint mapping in hours |
Key insight: Lucullus was architected when “software + infrastructure” was a bundle — IT and database expertise were assumed. QB Control eliminates the infrastructure layer entirely, shifting the model from “hire a DBA and a system integrator” to “plug in a cable” — or, for stainless-steel pilots, “deploy on an industrial PC and point it at your existing PLC over OPC-UA.”
4. Parallel Processing
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Capability | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-bioreactor control | Up to 8 standalone; unlimited with Client-Server/Enterprise | Multiple parallel processes (license-dependent), centralized from one host |
| Centralized multi-processing | Aggregates from multiple separate controllers after the fact | ✅ All processes run from one host — no inter-controller data integration |
| Dynamic P&ID per process | Manual HMI setup per controller/vessel | ✅ Auto-generated plug-and-play P&ID/HMI per process |
| Independent recipes per vessel | Yes — different recipes across reactors | Yes — different recipes per process; parallel and sequential execution |
| Sequential campaign queuing | Process planning / reactor allocation | Sequential batch execution with Pending queue + per-batch auto-stop (new) |
| Cross-reactor data comparison | ★★★★★ — Oracle-based cross-experiment analytics (core strength) | ★★★ — per-process graphs with multi-signal overlay + CSV export |
| Scaling model | Add bioreactors from any vendor, connect via drivers | Add QB Modules via PoE / expand via QB Switch; 3rd-party via OPC-UA |
| Independent process control | Each reactor independently controlled | Each process independent with its own P&ID, services, and per-process P-Stop |
| Shared resource management | Scheduling tools for shared equipment | Process-level allocation via System and Process modules; conflict blockade |
QB Control’s Parallel Processing Model
QB Control implements parallel processing through its System → Process → Batch hierarchy:
- System defines the physical resources (devices, services, equipment, media)
- Multiple Processes can be defined within a system, each with its own auto-generated P&ID, alarm configuration, recipe assignment, batch recording, and reports
- Multi-instance services allow the same service type to be instantiated across multiple processes
- Parallel recipe execution — multiple recipes run simultaneously across different processes
- Sequential execution (new) — batches queue with a Pending status and chain with auto-stop conditions for unattended campaign sequencing
- Process-level isolation — each process operates independently with its own control loop and its own per-process emergency stop (P-Stop)
Where QB Control Excels in Parallel Processing
- No system integrator needed to set up parallel operations
- Visual P&ID per process — auto-generated from configuration, not manually drawn; preserved on versioning
- Process & recipe Import/Export with device mapping — replicate a proven setup to new bioreactors and remap devices to the target system instantly
- Multi-user concurrent access — different operators monitor/control different processes from different devices
- Lower incremental cost — adding a parallel bioreactor = adding QB Modules + license expansion, not buying new controllers, Windows seats, or an integrator engagement
Where Lucullus Excels in Parallel Processing
- Cross-experiment data analytics is unmatched: because everything lives in one Oracle database, scientists can query, compare, and overlay data from hundreds of past runs across vessel types and scales — its core value proposition
- Practically unlimited vessel count at Client-Server/Enterprise editions
- Shared-equipment scheduling across heterogeneous, multi-vendor fleets
- Established multi-vendor parallel fleets already running on Lucullus drivers
5. Multi-Vendor Integration
Protocol Support Comparison
| Protocol | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| OPC UA | Server and client (data exchange) | Native — primary path for PLC/stainless-steel integration; dedicated OPC UA Connector with configurable mappings; full control of OPC-UA equipment |
| OPC DA / serial drivers | Native (RS232/RS485 + custom drivers) | Serial supported (QB Multiscale/Multisensor); legacy OPC DA not primary |
| Modbus | Via drivers | Native (TCP and RTU) |
| MQTT | Not a documented primary protocol | Native — IoT real-time streaming |
| REST API | Lucullus REST API (documented, Python library) | Native — modern web integrations |
| SQL (JDBC/ODBC) | Via Oracle (full SQL power) | Native — direct access to the embedded data store |
| LDAP/Active Directory | Basic user management | Native — SSO with corporate credentials, configurable search scope |
| MTP (Module Type Package) | Not documented | Supported (new) — plug-and-produce integration + MTP signal presentation in Graphs |
| SMTP (email) | Notifications (limited documentation) | Native — notification dispatch with SMTP config + delivery logs |
| PROFIBUS / PROFINET | Via controller drivers | Profibus supported; PLC protocols (Wago/Siemens/Beckhoff) |
| Secured external communication | Via VPN/DMZ/gateways | Supported — encrypted, protected external traffic; secure VPN |
Sensor & Bioreactor Vendor Support Comparison
| Vendor | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| Sartorius / Getinge / Applikon / Eppendorf / Infors bioreactors | Native breadth — 25+ years of driver library across dozens of vendors | Via OPC-UA connector (control of OPC-UA-enabled equipment); native QB hardware for new vessels |
| Hamilton | Via vendor tools + drivers | Native — via QB Multisensor (DO, pH, conductivity, OD, CO₂, ORP); two-point/zero-point/slope calibration |
| Mettler Toledo | Via vendor tools + drivers | Native — ISM/Modbus via QB Multisensor |
| Levitronix | Custom integration | Native — flow meters via QB Multisensor |
| Numera (automated sampling) | Native — best-in-class sample prep (filtration, dilution) | QB Syringe Pump + QB Selector Valve — native alternative |
Integration Philosophy Difference
Lucullus: “We are the universal data and control layer. Bring any bioreactor from any vendor; we connect it via a driver, monitor and control it, and warehouse all of its data in Oracle for cross-experiment analysis. New device types require a driver, built by us or commissioned through us.”
QB Control: “We provide both the control platform AND the hardware modules. Our modules natively connect Hamilton, Mettler Toledo, and Levitronix sensors with no drivers. For third-party bioreactors and PLCs, we offer a dedicated OPC-UA connector, plus Modbus, MQTT, REST API, SQL, and MTP — and we deploy on your existing PLCs for stainless-steel systems. No Oracle, no per-device driver project, no integrator.”
QB Control’s Integration Advantage
- Native sensor support — Hamilton and Mettler Toledo probes connect directly to QB Multisensor. No vendor middleware, no per-device drivers
- Modern protocols — MQTT, REST API, and SQL are native. Streaming bioreactor data to a cloud lake is a broker configuration, not a custom ETL project
- OPC UA Connector — a dedicated module bridges OPC-UA equipment (e.g., Sartorius bioreactors) into QB Control with configurable mappings — full control, not just data exchange — making QB Control a modern retrofit platform for legacy hardware
- MTP support (new) — plug-and-produce modular integration
- Auto-discovery vs. manual driver commissioning — plug in a QB Module and it appears in inventory automatically
Lucullus’s Integration Advantage
- Driver-library breadth — 25+ years of connectors for Sartorius, Getinge/Applikon, Eppendorf, Infors, and dozens more, including non-OPC legacy equipment QB cannot reach over OPC-UA
- Mature Getinge/Applikon partnership (10+ years) with deeply tested integrations
- Extensive analytical-device support — offline/online analyzers, DSP devices, incubators
- Numera + Amphora — purpose-built automated sampling, sample prep, and gravimetric multi-feed hardware
- Proven at production and enterprise scale with complex, heterogeneous, multi-vendor installations
6. Software Module Comparison
Module-by-Module Mapping
QB Control ships 18 software modules, accessed through the Portal. The two additions since the previous comparison are Remote Access and Health Monitoring.
| Capability Area | Lucullus Component | QB Control Module | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device Management | Device management + driver setup | Inventory (auto-discovery, device status, configuration import/export, licensing) | QB simpler & faster (no drivers) |
| System Configuration | System configuration | System (visual resource allocation, search, bulk add/remove, history to CSV) | QB no-code, visual |
| Process Configuration | Process planning + reactor allocation | Process (visual binding, versioning, duplicate, live connection status, guided import/export) | QB faster; Lucullus adds DoE planning |
| Process Visualization | Process visualization (manual HMI screens) | P&ID (auto-generated, drag-and-drop, recipe execution from diagram, P-Stop/E-Stop) | QB auto-generates; Lucullus manual |
| Batch Management | Recipe management with event-based control | Recipe (Designer / Batch / Executions Boards) | QB visual designer with Services |
| Services Catalog | No equivalent (per-device configuration) | Services (~40 templates across 10 categories, load & execute in minutes) | QB unique advantage |
| Service Profiles | No equivalent | Service Profiles (reusable grouped/atomic parameter templates, portable import/export) | QB unique advantage |
| Alarm Management | Alarm management | Alarms (ISA-18.2 conformance, watchlist, in-app global notifications) | QB explicitly ISA-18.2 |
| Data Visualization | Data visualization + trending | Graphs (live + history, multi-axis, annotations, MTP signals, export) | Lucullus stronger cross-experiment; QB per-process real-time |
| Reporting | Automatic batch report generation | Reports (automated + manual, PDF/DOCX, recipe-execution & service-history sections) | Comparable |
| Batch Tracking | Batch execution tracking | Runs (per-process, batch ID, user tracking, report linkage) | Comparable |
| Calibration | Device-vendor tools (not a core module) | Calibration (status tracking, Next Due Dates, Hamilton/pump methods) | QB integrated; Lucullus external |
| Audit Trail | Audit trail via Oracle DB | Audit Trail (21 CFR Part 11 conformance, cross-module, exportable CSV) | Both strong; QB purpose-built module |
| Access Control | User management | Users & Roles (RBAC, granular per-module permissions, LDAP/AD) | QB more granular & modern |
| Notifications | Notifications (limited documentation) | Notifications (in-app center, email/SMTP, per-user preferences, recipe-step alerts, logs) | QB richer out-of-box |
| Backup | Database backup (Oracle utilities) | Backup, Export & Archive (scheduled/manual wizards, one-click restore, integrity verification) | QB purpose-built; Lucullus relies on DBA tools |
| License Management | License management | License (feature/device/system/time-based, online/offline, host-bound, license guards) | QB more flexible |
| Remote Access | VPN + Windows RDP | Remote Access (secure VPN, QR-code setup, phone/tablet/PC, role-based) — new | QB simpler, multi-device |
| Health Monitoring | Diagnostics across tools | Health Monitoring (system health dashboard, per-module status, drill-down) — new | QB consolidated, always-on |
| DoE Integration | Native 3rd-party DoE integration | ❌ Not available (export via REST/CSV) | Lucullus wins |
| Sample Management | Barcode tracking, at-line analyzer retrieval | ◐ Manual via Inventory | Lucullus wins |
| Media Management | Automated media creation, raw-material tracking | ◐ Manual via Inventory | Lucullus wins |
| Cross-Experiment Analytics | Oracle-powered multi-run comparison | ◐ Per-process graphs + CSV export | Lucullus wins |
7. Services Catalog & Rapid Deployment
QB Control’s Services Catalog — A Game-Changing Differentiator
One of QB Control’s most powerful advantages over Lucullus is the Services Catalog — a library of pre-built, parameterized service templates that can be loaded and executed within minutes. A Service is a pre-defined control action that directly commands hardware. Services come in two types:
- Autocomplete Services — execute a discrete task and close automatically (e.g., Transfer Volume by Pump, Set Sparger Volume & Mass Flow)
- Continuous Services — run until explicitly stopped (e.g., Set Agitator Speed, Temperature Control by TCU, pH Control by Base & CO₂)
Lucullus, by contrast, provides process control but has no equivalent template library that works out of the box — each control strategy must be configured per device based on the connected controller’s capabilities and Lucullus drivers. Event-based control is possible but requires configuring triggers, conditions, and actions specific to the connected hardware.
Services Catalog by Category
QB Control ships with ~40 pre-built service templates across 10 functional categories out of the box, with QB Filtration adding a tangential-flow filtration set (recently expanded). This covers every core bioprocess control need:
| Category | Example Services | Count | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH Control | pH Control by Base & CO₂, by Base & Acid, by One Pump, One Pump PID, pH PID Control | 6 | Continuous |
| Temperature Control | by TCU, by Heating Mat, by Steam & Water, Split Temp, Set Circulator Temp, Set Heating Mat Power | 6 | Continuous |
| Pump & Feed | Feed, Autosubstrate, Set Pump Flow Rate, Set Centrifugal Pump RPM, Transfer Volume/Bolus, Gravimetric Feeding | 9 | Continuous + Autocomplete |
| Gas Control | O₂ Control, Advanced O₂ Control, Set MFC Flow, Set Sparger Mass Flow | 4 | Continuous |
| Gas Volume Delivery | Set Sparger Volume & Mass Flow | 1 | Autocomplete |
| Sampling | Automated Sampling, Sample by Syringe Pump, Sampler Cleaning | 3 | Continuous + Autocomplete |
| Stirring & Agitation | Stirring, Set Agitator Speed | 2 | Continuous |
| Foam Control | Foam Control, Foam Control by Antifoam Reagent | 2 | Continuous |
| Valve Control | Set Selector Valve Position, Set Valve Position | 2 | Continuous |
| LED & Light | LED Control, LED Control Scheduler | 2 | Continuous |
| Core catalog (out of the box) | ~40 | across 10 categories | |
| QB Filtration add-on | Filtervig Control, Concentration Factor Logic, NWP Calculator, Breakthrough Detection, plus six new tangential-flow services | expanded | Continuous + Autocomplete |
Service Profiles — Reusable Parameter Templates
QB Control’s Service Profiles let users save standardized parameter configurations as reusable templates with grouped and atomic-style configuration models, structured profile cards (e.g., PID Controller Tuning, Temperature Ramp, Operating Limits), and portable export/import to transfer complete profile sets between templates or environments. Profile-driven values are labeled in execution review for traceability — so an operator can switch strategies or adjust parameters in minutes without re-engineering control logic.
Deployment Time Comparison
| Activity | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| Install software | Hours (Windows, Oracle, client) | 0 — browser-based, pre-installed on host |
| Connect first bioreactor (QB hardware) | Days–weeks (driver development/verification) | Minutes (plug PoE cable, auto-discovery) |
| Connect third-party bioreactor (OPC-UA) | Days–weeks (driver development) | Hours (configure OPC-UA connector endpoint) |
| Configure first control loop | Hours (driver + recipe + alarm setup) | Minutes (select service template, apply profile) |
| Switch pH-by-CO₂ → pH-by-acid | Reconfigure recipe/control logic | Select a different service template — minutes |
| Add a second identical vessel | Hours (duplicate config, verify) | Minutes (plug in modules, assign to process) |
| Go from zero to running experiment | Weeks (typical, with integrator support) | Hours to days (self-service) |
8. Recipe Engine
Overview
The Recipe Module is the core automation engine of QB Control. It translates biotechnological protocols into executable digital workflows by combining logic blocks and Services (hardware actions), through three integrated boards: Designer Board (create/edit), Batch Board (configure/execute), and Executions Board (monitor history). Lucullus provides recipe management with event-based triggers, but its model is form/script-based and tied to per-device driver configuration.
8.1 Designer Board & the Unified Block Library
The Designer Board is a visual, drag-and-drop workspace for building process logic as a connected flow. QB Control consolidates per-service blocks into a unified block library with built-in grouping, descriptions, tooltips, and embedded in-app guidance:
| Block | Category | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Start Service | Service Control | Single configurable block; pick the service at configuration; supports Autocomplete (run-to-completion) and Continuous (keep running) |
| Stop Service | Service Control | Explicitly stop a continuous service later in the flow |
| Update Service Inputs | Service Control | Change service input values mid-execution (startup vs. runtime-adjustable inputs kept separate) |
| Service Profile support | Service Control | Start/Update blocks accept preset profile configurations; profile values labeled in execution review |
| Manual Operation | Operations | Pause for operator-driven action where supervised intervention is required |
| Variable / Update Variables | Variables | Declare named values (boolean, text, number, time); update with increase / decrease / multiply / divide |
| Timer | Timing | Shared timer control with start / stop / pause / resume modes |
| Set Valve State | Equipment commands | Command valve positions directly as part of the sequence |
| Conditional | Logic & flow | Evaluate real-time variables with AND / OR expressions |
| Counter | Logic & flow | Loop control with iteration count |
| PID | Logic & flow | Inline PID-oriented control block |
| Polygon | Logic & flow | Piecewise-linear mapping (X→Y) for ramps and profiles |
| Split / Merge | Logic & flow | Fork into parallel paths and join them back together |
| Start / Stop / End | Standard | Execution control endpoints for the flow |
Authoring productivity: copy/paste of blocks, signal filtering for cleaner input selection, undo/redo, diagram export (image), and recipe import/export across installations.
8.2 Recipe Lifecycle & Governance
Recipe state lifecycle: Draft → Verified → Validated → Hold → Archived. Critically, only Verified or Validated recipes can run in batches — not just Validated — which streamlines development without weakening control. Recipes can be duplicated for rapid variation, and the designer flags inactive recipes that should not be started as-is. Lucullus does not document an equivalent color-coded state model.
8.3 Batch Board
- Create batches for processes and assign single or multiple recipes per batch
- Real-time view to monitor and control execution (stop, pause, resume)
- Sequential batch execution with Pending status for queued batches and auto-stop configuration per batch
- Edit parameters from the execution board where permitted — no round-trip to the designer mid-run
- Step execution counts and live recipe status updates
- Single recipe → batch and multiple recipes → batch (user-defined sequence or parallel), all recorded with full traceability
8.4 Executions Board
- List of executed batches with start/finish time, status, and configuration
- Statuses: During Execution, Paused, Hold, Pending, Completed, Failed, Aborted
- Filter by System, Process, Status; export list to CSV; export recipe flow to PNG
- Direct links to the live view of currently executing recipes
8.5 Validation & Safety
- The Validator — visual workspace for verifying recipe logic before execution
- Automated pre-start validations prevent batch collisions, unauthorized recipe starts, and execution on disconnected hardware
- Mandatory pre-execution checklist forces operators to verify critical lab elements (tubing integrity, media preparation) before start
- License guard — creating, duplicating, or importing recipes is blocked when the recipe license limit is reached
- Emergency integration — runs hold or abort safely when a P-Stop or global E-Stop is active
8.6 Recipe Engine vs. Lucullus — Detailed Comparison
| Capability | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control Recipe Engine |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow design | Form/script-based with event triggers | Visual drag-and-drop Designer Board (no coding) |
| Recipe versioning | Not documented in detail | Draft → Verified → Validated → Hold → Archived |
| Recipe import/export | ✓ | ✓ — full recipe import/export across installations |
| Process import/export | Limited | ✓ — complete process config (devices, services, recipes, P&ID) + device mapping |
| Conditional logic | Event triggers on sensor readings | Conditional blocks with AND/OR on real-time data |
| Variables & math | Configurable per controller | Variable / Update Variables (increase/decrease/multiply/divide) |
| Timers | Event-based scheduling | Timer block (start/stop/pause/resume) |
| Human-in-the-loop | Configurable prompts | Manual Operation block |
| Event-based control | ★★★★★ — sophisticated triggers + Numera integration | ★★★★ — Conditional, sensor-based services |
| DoE integration | ★★★★★ — native 3rd-party DoE | ★★ — export via REST/CSV |
| Pre-execution safety | Not documented as system-enforced | Mandatory checklist + Validator (system-enforced) |
| Sequential campaigns | Process planning / reactor allocation | Sequential batches with Pending queue + auto-stop |
| Parallel recipe execution | ✓ | ✓ — user chooses sequence or parallel mode |
| Diagram export | Not standard | Export as image / PNG for compliance docs |
| Time to create a recipe | Hours to days | Minutes to hours (visual, no-code) |
9. Regulatory Compliance
| Standard | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR Part 11 | Supported — electronic records, audit trail via Oracle | ⚠️ Partial conformance | Lucullus supports e-records and e-signatures for regulated environments. QB: electronic records, audit trails, access control, RBAC, data integrity today — electronic signatures not yet covered |
| EU Annex 11 | Supported (implied by pharma installed base) | ✅ Compliance support | Both provide computerized-system validation capabilities |
| GAMP 5 | Category 5 (custom, device-specific drivers) | Category 4 (configurable) | QB Control has lower validation burden — no custom code to validate |
| ISA-18.2 (Alarms) | Not explicitly documented | ✅ Conformance | QB supports suppressed, out-of-service, acknowledgement workflows |
| ISA-88 (Batch) | Partial — recipe-based batch control | ⚠️ Follows batch concepts; not formally certified | Comparable at lab/pilot scale |
| ALCOA+ (Data Integrity) | Oracle structured, traceable storage | ✅ Full implementation | Both provide ALCOA+ data integrity |
| Electronic Signatures | Supported (for regulated environments) | ◐ On roadmap (Q3 2026 — not in current version) | Lucullus leads today; QB planned |
| Audit Trail | Via Oracle database logging | ✅ Purpose-built module, cross-module, exportable CSV | Both comprehensive; QB granular per-module |
| Role-Based Access Control | User management with access control | ✅ Granular RBAC with per-module, per-action permissions, LDAP/AD | QB more granular |
| Safe Position Logic (GMP) | Via controller/interlock engineering | ✅ Built-in — define safe actuator states after restart/power cycle | QB has a dedicated, configurable feature |
| CE Marking | System-level (via 3rd-party hardware) | ✅ Per QB Module (EMC + Low Voltage Directive) | Each module ships its own Declaration of Conformity |
Compliance Value for QB Control
GAMP 5 Category 4 vs. Category 5 is the critical differentiator. Lucullus’s device-specific drivers constitute custom code (Category 5) that must be validated individually for every unique hardware combination, whereas QB Control is configured through UI settings, service templates, and service profiles — the same validated software runs on every host. The result is roughly 50–70% less validation documentation than a Lucullus installation with multiple device drivers, with faster IQ/OQ/PQ (weeks vs. months), lower CSV cost, and simpler change management (configuration, not code; firmware updates do not trigger re-validation).
Honest Compliance Caveat
QB Control’s 21 CFR Part 11 conformance is partial: it delivers electronic records, audit trails, access control, RBAC, and data integrity today, but electronic signatures are not yet implemented (roadmapped for Q3 2026). Lucullus, deployed in regulated pharma environments for years, supports electronic signatures today. For workflows that require digital signatures on an active IND now, Lucullus (or another e-signature-capable system) remains the safer choice until QB Control’s e-signature release. Do not represent QB Control as fully 21 CFR Part 11 compliant.
10. Pricing, Licensing & TCO
Direct Cost Comparison
| Cost Component | Lucullus PIMS (Estimated) | QB Control | Savings with QB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Software license | ~$30,000–80,000+ (edition & bioreactor count) | Included with QB hardware (perpetual license) | Significant |
| Oracle database license | $0 (XE standalone) → $10,000–50,000+ (full Oracle) | $0 — no external database | 100% |
| Bioreactor hardware | Third-party — $30,000–100,000+ per bioreactor | QB Modules included in system price | Significant |
| Driver development | $5,000–20,000 per device type (custom drivers) | $0 — QB Modules auto-discover | 100% |
| System integrator | $10,000–50,000+ (install, config, validation) | $0 — self-service plug-and-play | 100% |
| Windows Server license | $500–2,000 | $0 — runs its own OS / industrial PC | 100% |
| Annual maintenance/support | ~15–25% of license cost per year | Optional tiered support (Basic/Standard/Premium) | Significant |
| Training | $5,000–15,000 (formal Securecell courses) | QB Systems Online Portal + docs (self-paced, included) | 80–90% |
| Validation (GAMP 5) | Category 5 — extensive IQ/OQ/PQ | Category 4 — reduced scope | 50–70% |
QB Control System Pricing (Reference Figures, USD)
| Configuration | QB Control Price |
|---|---|
| Entry-level system (1 bioreactor) | $15,000–25,000 |
| 4-bioreactor lab setup | $60,000–85,000 |
| 6-bioreactor lab setup | ~$100,000 (hardware) |
| Pilot setup (8–12 bioreactors) | $150,000–250,000 |
| System integrator cost | $0 (self-setup, plug-and-play) |
| Workstation hardware | $0 (any device with a browser) |
Total Cost of Ownership (5-Year Projection)
Scenario: 4-bioreactor lab
| Cost Component | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| Software license | $50,000 | $0 (included) |
| Oracle DB (standalone XE) | $0 | $0 |
| Bioreactor hardware (4 vessels + controllers) | $120,000–200,000 | $60,000–85,000 (all-inclusive) |
| Driver integration | $15,000 | $0 |
| System integrator / installation | $20,000 | $0 |
| Windows Server + workstations | $3,000 | $0 |
| 5-year maintenance (software) | $37,500 (~15%/yr) | $15,000–25,000 (support tier) |
| 5-year database administration | $10,000 | $0 |
| Training | $10,000 | $0 (online portal) |
| 5-Year Total | $265,500–345,500 | $75,000–110,000 |
| ~58–78% lower TCO |
Note: Lucullus pricing is estimated based on typical enterprise bioprocess software costs. Securecell does not publish list prices; actual costs vary by configuration, region, and negotiation. QB Control prices are reference figures based on past quotations and do not constitute a specific priced offer.
Licensing Model Comparison
| Aspect | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Annual or subscription (typical enterprise software) + Oracle | Perpetual — feature-, device-, system/process-, and time-based dimensions |
| License Type | Recurring renewal | Perpetual — buy once; no recurring license fees |
| Per-bioreactor licensing | Commonly by bioreactor count or edition tier | Device- and feature-based |
| Support | Annual maintenance (% of license) | Paid separately — tiered (Basic/Standard/Premium), client’s choice |
| Enforcement | License management + Oracle | Software license bound to the deployment host; license-aware UI and guards |
| Upgrade path | Paid version upgrades | Software updates via the management interface |
| Lock-in | Oracle + Windows + driver dependency | Not tied to a specific hardware vendor |
Licensing Model — Key Client Value
- No recurring license fees — the perpetual license does not expire, eliminating Lucullus’s annual renewal burden
- No Oracle tax — zero database licensing and zero DBA labor
- Paid support is optional and tiered — no forced bundling
- Predictable budgeting — one-time license + optional support
- No “license hostage” risk — a lapsed contract never locks you out of your own system
11. Industry Fit Analysis
Biotech (Cell Culture, Fermentation)
| Criterion | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-vendor bioreactor support | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | Lucullus |
| Turnkey lab automation | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| Cross-experiment data analytics | ★★★★★ | ★★★ | Lucullus |
| Time to first experiment | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| Automated sampling | ★★★★★ (Numera) | ★★★★ (QB Syringe + Selector Valve) | Lucullus |
| Cost per bioreactor setup | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
Pharmaceuticals (Process Development)
| Criterion | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DoE integration | ★★★★★ | ★★ | Lucullus |
| Regulatory validation effort | ★★★ (GAMP 5) | ★★★★★ (GAMP 4) | QB Control |
| Data integrity for submissions | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | Lucullus |
| Electronic signatures today | ★★★★ | ★★ | Lucullus |
| Recipe management flexibility | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| Enterprise scalability | ★★★★★ | ★★ | Lucullus |
Cosmetics & Food/Beverage
| Criterion | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small batch flexibility | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| Setup simplicity | ★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| Hardware cost | ★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| IT overhead | ★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
Academic / Research
| Criterion | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Budget compatibility | ★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| Student ease of use | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| Data analysis tools | ★★★★★ | ★★★ | Lucullus |
| No IT department needed | ★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
| Teaching lab scalability | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | QB Control |
Industry Decision Guide
- Biotech R&D / Process Development: Lucullus preferred IF DoE and cross-experiment analytics are the #1 priority; QB preferred IF rapid setup, compliance burden, and unified hardware control matter more.
- CDMOs: QB wins for dedicated client lines with standardized vessels (fast changeover, perpetual licensing, no Oracle admin); Lucullus wins where vendor-agnostic breadth across many client bioreactors is essential.
- Academic Research: QB wins — no IT department, plug-and-play teaching labs.
- Cosmetics & Fine Chemicals: QB wins — small batches, simple deployment, cost-effective.
- GMP Scale-Up: Lucullus can complement QB — Lucullus for historical data aggregation and DoE, QB for real-time control and stainless-steel pilot cells via PLC.
12. What QB Control Can Replace
Full Replacement Scenarios
QB Control can fully replace Lucullus PIMS when:
- New greenfield lab — building from scratch with no legacy equipment. Value: unified hardware + software, days vs. weeks setup, no Oracle, no integrator.
- Small R&D lab (1–6 bioreactors) — where Lucullus’s analytics breadth is not the priority. Value: turnkey control, perpetual license, zero DBA.
- Academic / teaching lab — budget-sensitive, simplicity over analytical depth. Value: browser UI, no IT overhead, modular hardware.
- Pilot facility with standardized vessels — all vessels on QB hardware. Value: one vendor, lower TCO, native sensors.
- Startup biotech — rapid setup, minimal IT, maximum operational speed. Value: unbox and run.
- Lab with retrofittable OPC-UA equipment — Sartorius and other OPC-UA bioreactors. Value: QB’s OPC-UA connector controls third-party hardware as a modern replacement control platform.
- Stainless-steel pilot cell with an existing PLC (new) — Value: deploy QB Control on an industrial PC and integrate the PLC over OPC-UA, reusing field hardware.
Partial Replacement Scenarios
QB Control can replace specific aspects while Lucullus handles others:
- New vessel additions — run new vessels on QB Control while legacy vessels remain on Lucullus
- Satellite labs — QB Control for smaller satellite operations, Lucullus for the main facility
- Real-time control layer — QB handles SCADA control while Lucullus retains historical data warehousing and DoE
- Prototyping / rapid iteration — QB for early-stage work, transfer to Lucullus for formal data studies
Not a Replacement For
QB Control is not designed to replace Lucullus PIMS in:
- Enterprise multi-site deployments — where a centralized Oracle data warehouse is essential
- Existing installations with dozens of drivers — where Lucullus’s vendor integration library (including non-OPC equipment) is already established
- DoE-heavy process development — where Lucullus’s native DoE tooling provides irreplaceable value
- Numera-dependent workflows — where Securecell’s automated sampling/sample-prep hardware is deeply integrated
- Cross-experiment analytics at scale — where unlimited Oracle SQL querying across hundreds of historical runs is core
13. Where QB Control Creates Superior Value
13.1 Value Summary
Each pillar is detailed in the section noted; in brief, QB Control delivers:
- No external database dependency — an embedded data store on the host replaces Lucullus’s Oracle requirement, eliminating DB licensing, DBA labor, and database-failure risk (§3).
- Unified hardware + software, single vendor — QB Systems builds the host, the modular devices, and all software, so one vendor owns the whole stack and the support for it (§3).
- Unified SCADA control + process data in one platform — real-time control and batch data run on the same host, versus Lucullus being a data/PIMS layer on top of separate controllers (§6).
- No driver development — QB Modules auto-discover natively and the OPC-UA connector monitors and controls third-party equipment, with no per-device drivers, OPC licensing, or gateways (§5).
- Zero-integrator self-service — unbox, connect PoE, auto-discover, and run from any browser; perpetual licensing with no Oracle tax or vendor lock-in (§7, §10).
- Modern, open integration and right-sized governance — native REST, MQTT, SQL, MTP, and OPC-UA, plus GAMP 5 Category 4 (~50–70% less validation), P-Stop/E-Stop, Safe Position Logic, and a mandatory pre-execution checklist + Validator (§5, §9).
14. Gaps & Limitations
Lucullus Capabilities Not Available (or Weaker) in QB Control
| Capability | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-experiment analytics | Oracle-powered multi-run comparison/overlay across hundreds of runs | Per-process graphs + CSV export | High |
| Design of Experiments (DoE) | Native 3rd-party DoE integration | Export via REST/CSV to external tools | High |
| Multi-vendor breadth (non-OPC) | 25+ years of drivers, including legacy non-OPC equipment | OPC-UA connector reaches OPC-UA devices only | High |
| Enterprise multi-site | Centralized Oracle data harmonization across sites | Single-site (networkable) | High |
| Numera automated sampling | Best-in-class sample prep (filtration, dilution) | Native alternative (Syringe Pump + Selector Valve) | Medium |
| Amphora multi-feed | Dedicated gravimetric single/multi-feed station | QB Multiscale + QB Pump (native alternative) | Medium |
| Media management | Automated media creation + raw-material tracking | Manual via Inventory | Medium |
| Sample management | Barcode tracking + at-line analyzer retrieval | Manual via Inventory | Medium |
| Electronic signatures | Supported today | On roadmap (Q3 2026) | High for regulated production today |
| Established installed base | 25+ years, deployed at enterprise scale | Newer, lab-to-pilot focus | Medium |
Honest Assessment of QB Control Limitations
- Cross-experiment analytics depth — Lucullus’s Oracle backbone enables unlimited querying and overlay across hundreds of historical runs; QB exports data for external analysis but is not a data-warehouse platform
- No native DoE — design-of-experiments planning is not a QB Control feature; data must be exported to external DoE tools
- Multi-vendor breadth — QB reaches third-party hardware via OPC-UA; legacy non-OPC equipment still needs Lucullus drivers
- No enterprise multi-site warehouse — QB is single-site (networkable), not a global data-harmonization layer
- No electronic signatures yet — 21 CFR Part 11 conformance is partial until the Q3 2026 release
- Media / sample management — automated media creation and barcode-based sample lifecycle management are Lucullus-only workflows
- Liquid-handling focus — QB Control does not address gas-phase, solid-phase, or complex hybrid processes
For a lab that already runs Lucullus with Numera and 10+ multi-vendor bioreactors, switching wholesale to QB Control would mean replacing process hardware — an unrealistic proposition. Lucullus’s strength is being the software backbone for heterogeneous, established labs. QB Control wins when starting fresh, when cost and IT simplicity matter, when a unified platform is the goal, or when retrofitting OPC-UA-enabled hardware.
15. Migration & Replacement Scenarios
Scenario A: Greenfield Lab (New Biotech Startup)
Recommendation: QB Control. New company, no legacy equipment, 4–8 bioreactors for cell-culture process development. Single order from QB Systems (everything included), $0 software/Oracle add-on, plug-and-play setup in days vs. weeks, ~60–70% lower total investment than a multi-vendor Lucullus build. No migration, no legacy.
Scenario B: Lab Expansion (Existing Lucullus Customer)
Recommendation: QB Control in parallel for new vessels. A pharma R&D lab runs Lucullus on 6 Applikon bioreactors and wants 4 more for a new project. Add QB Control systems (plug-and-play, perpetual license, $60K–85K hardware) for the independent new project rather than buying more controllers and extending the Oracle schema. Keep Lucullus for the existing fleet’s data continuity; export QB data via REST API/CSV where aggregation is needed. Best if the new project is independent and budget-conscious.
Scenario C: Academic Teaching Lab
Recommendation: QB Control (full replacement). A university needs 6 benchtop bioreactors for teaching. Lucullus’s minimum viable setup carries Oracle, Windows Server, and DBA/network admin burden; QB Control runs in any browser on any laptop with no IT support, intuitive auto-generated P&IDs, and firmware-only maintenance — at materially lower cost and a gentler learning curve for students.
Scenario D: Retrofit of OPC-UA-Enabled Bioreactors
Recommendation: QB Control via the OPC-UA connector. A lab has Sartorius (or other OPC-UA) bioreactors with dated control interfaces. Deploy QB Control and use the OPC-UA connector to monitor and control the existing equipment, gaining a modern browser UI, Services Catalog, centralized multi-processing, and built-in compliance modules — without replacing working hardware or commissioning Lucullus drivers.
Scenario E: Stainless-Steel Pilot Cell with an Existing PLC (new)
Recommendation: QB Control on an industrial PC. Deploy QB Control on an industrial PC, integrate the existing PLC (Wago/Siemens/Beckhoff) over OPC-UA via the OPC UA Connector, and keep the field instruments. Value: SCADA-class supervisory control and recipes without Oracle, driver development, or integrator re-engineering — and without a software-only PIMS layer bolted on top.
Scenario F: CDMO (Contract Development & Manufacturing)
Recommendation: mixed. For dedicated client lines with standardized vessels, QB Control wins — rapid setup/teardown, process import/export + device mapping for fast replication, perpetual licensing, no Oracle admin between campaigns. Where the CDMO must connect to many clients’ different (and sometimes non-OPC) bioreactors and harmonize all data centrally, Lucullus’s vendor-agnostic breadth is the better fit — and the two can coexist.
Coexistence Architecture
QB Control and Lucullus can coexist in a hybrid architecture:
- QB handles real-time bioreactor control — SCADA layer: monitoring, recipe execution, setpoint management, multi-process orchestration
- Lucullus aggregates data from QB + other sources — PIMS layer: historical warehousing, cross-experiment analytics, DoE-tool integration via REST API or OPC-UA
- Realistic hybrid where QB replaces Lucullus’s control functions while Lucullus retains data warehousing and advanced analytics
Customers can migrate incrementally: run QB for new processes, stream data to Lucullus for aggregation, and eventually retire Lucullus’s control layer while preserving its data repository.
Migration Risk Assessment
| Risk Factor | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Historical data loss | High — Oracle DB not directly portable | Export via Lucullus REST API or Oracle dump before migration; archive on shared storage |
| Driver / OPC incompatibility | Medium — existing OPC configs won’t transfer | QB auto-discovers modules; OPC-UA enables integration with third-party legacy bioreactors |
| Staff retraining | Low — QB browser UI simpler than Lucullus | 1–2 day QB training vs. longer Lucullus onboarding; self-paced QB Systems Online Portal |
| Recipe re-implementation | Medium — Lucullus recipes must be rebuilt | QB Services Catalog provides ~40 pre-built strategies; most logic recreated visually via drag-and-drop |
| Regulatory re-validation | Medium — new system requires IQ/OQ/PQ | GAMP Category 4 reduces effort 50–70% vs. Lucullus Category 5 |
16. Competitive Positioning Strategy
Positioning Statement
QB Control is not trying to be Lucullus. Lucullus PIMS is the industry’s most established bioprocess data-integration layer — a universal translator for every bioreactor language, with deep cross-experiment analytics and DoE. But that translation layer comes at a cost: Oracle databases, Windows servers, custom drivers, and system integrators that add weeks and hundreds of thousands of dollars to every deployment. When you are building a new lab, modernizing legacy equipment, or expanding with standardized vessels, you do not need a universal translator — you need hardware and software that speak the same language natively. QB Control delivers a unified platform with ~40 pre-built services, plug-and-play deployment, an OPC-UA connector for existing equipment, an industrial-PC path for stainless-steel PLC systems, 50–70% less validation effort, and 58–78% lower total cost.
Key Sales Arguments Against Lucullus
| Lucullus Pain Point | QB Control Advantage | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| ”Every new device needs a driver — weeks of work” | Plug-and-play auto-discovery; OPC-UA for third-party | Minutes vs. weeks |
| ”Oracle DBA and licensing cost us every year” | Embedded data store — zero DBA, zero DB licensing | No Oracle tax |
| ”We pay an integrator for every change” | Self-service — visual no-code recipe designer + Services Catalog | $0 integrator |
| ”Validation took months under Category 5” | GAMP 5 Category 4 | 50–70% less validation |
| ”Control and data live in two different systems” | Unified SCADA + PIMS on one host | Single pane of glass |
| ”Switching a control strategy means reconfiguring controllers” | Swap a service template | Minutes, not days |
| ”Our Sartorius bioreactors have a dated interface” | OPC-UA connector controls them as a modern retrofit | No new hardware |
| ”We have a stainless-steel pilot with a PLC” | Industrial-PC deployment over OPC-UA (new) | Reuse field hardware |
| ”License renewals and upgrades keep escalating” | Perpetual license — buy once | No recurring fees |
When NOT to Position Against Lucullus PIMS
Do not propose QB Control as a replacement for Lucullus when the client needs:
- 50+ bioreactors from multiple vendors already on Lucullus — switching cost is prohibitive; position QB for new standalone vessels only
- Enterprise multi-site data harmonization — Lucullus Enterprise with a centralized Oracle warehouse is the right tool
- DoE-driven process development as the core workflow — Lucullus’s native DoE integration is genuinely superior
- Cross-experiment analytics across hundreds of historical runs — Oracle SQL querying is Lucullus’s core strength
- Numera automated sampling deeply embedded — replacing Numera with QB sampling may not be acceptable
- Electronic signatures on an active IND today — defer until QB Control’s Q3 2026 e-signature release
- Connection to legacy non-OPC multi-vendor hardware — Lucullus’s driver breadth covers what QB’s OPC-UA reach cannot
In these cases, position QB Control as complementary to Lucullus — QB for real-time control and new/stainless-steel cells, Lucullus for data warehousing, DoE, and enterprise analytics — bridged over OPC-UA/REST.
17. Feature-by-Feature Matrix
| # | Feature | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control | QB Advantage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORE CONTROL | |||||
| 1 | Real-time process control | ◐ (data layer; control via controllers) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: unified SCADA + PIMS |
| 2 | Mixer/agitator control | ★★★★ (via controller) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB native agitator modules (up to 6 vessels) |
| 3 | Pump control | ★★★★ (via controller) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: 4 pump types native + SmartPump OPC |
| 4 | Sampler control | ★★★★★ (Numera) | ★★★★ | Numera: sample prep, filtration, dilution | |
| 5 | Gas flow control | ★★★★ (via controller) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: native mass flow controller |
| 6 | Temperature control | ★★★★ (via controller) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB Thermo + PID service |
| 7 | pH control | ★★★★ (via controller) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: CO₂, acid, or base+acid options |
| 8 | Dissolved oxygen control | ★★★★ (via controller) | ★★★★ | Comparable (QB Gasflow + Multisensor) | |
| 9 | Scale/weight measurement | ★★★★ (via controller) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: native multiscale (6 channels) |
| 10 | Foam detection | ★★★★ (via controller) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: native optical sensor |
| 11 | LED/light control | ✗ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: native photobioreactor lighting |
| PARALLEL PROCESSING | |||||
| 12 | Multi-bioreactor parallel | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | Lucullus: practically unlimited at Enterprise | |
| 13 | Centralized multi-processing | ★★ (aggregates controllers) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: all processes on one host |
| 14 | Sequential campaign queuing | ★★★★ | ★★★★ | QB: Pending queue + auto-stop (new) | |
| 15 | Auto-generated P&ID per process | ★★ (manual HMI) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB auto-generates; Lucullus manual |
| 16 | Process import/export + device mapping | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: one-click replication + remap |
| 17 | Multi-user concurrent access | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: any browser; Lucullus: licensed seats |
| RECIPE, BATCH & SERVICES | |||||
| 18 | Recipe management | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | Lucullus event-based; QB visual |
| 19 | Visual drag-and-drop designer | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: no-code DAG-style flow |
| 20 | Recipe versioning | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: Draft→Verified→Validated→Hold→Archived |
| 21 | Services Catalog | ✗ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: ~40 services across 10 categories; Lucullus: none |
| 22 | Service Profiles (reusable params) | ✗ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: grouped/atomic + portable import/export |
| 23 | Variables / Timer / Manual blocks | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: unified block library (new) |
| 24 | Strategy switching speed | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: swap service in minutes |
| 25 | Recipe import/export | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: cross-installation sharing |
| 26 | Process import/export | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: complete process config + device mapping |
| 27 | Pre-execution safety checklist | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: mandatory + Validator (system-enforced) |
| 28 | Batch/Executions tracking | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: dedicated Batch + Executions Boards |
| 29 | Event-based control | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | Lucullus: sophisticated triggers + Numera | |
| DATA MANAGEMENT & ANALYTICS | |||||
| 30 | Centralized database | ★★★★★ (Oracle) | ★★★ (embedded data store) | Lucullus: enterprise-grade warehouse | |
| 31 | Cross-experiment analytics | ★★★★★ | ★★ | Lucullus: core differentiator | |
| 32 | Real-time process graphs | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: per-process live signals |
| 33 | Historical data views | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | Lucullus: Oracle-powered queries | |
| 34 | Data export (CSV, PDF) | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | Both support standard exports |
| 35 | Design of Experiments (DoE) | ★★★★★ | ✗ | Lucullus only | |
| 36 | Media management | ★★★★★ | ◐ | Lucullus: automated media creation | |
| 37 | Sample management | ★★★★★ | ◐ | Lucullus: barcoding + at-line analyzers | |
| INTEGRATION | |||||
| 38 | OPC UA | ★★★★ (data exchange) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: native + dedicated Connector, full control |
| 39 | Multi-vendor bioreactor support | ★★★★★ | ★★★★ | Lucullus: broader driver library; QB: OPC-UA reach | |
| 40 | REST API | ★★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | Both provide REST API |
| 41 | MQTT | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: native |
| 42 | SQL access | ★★★★★ (Oracle SQL) | ★★★★ | Lucullus: full Oracle power | |
| 43 | MTP support | ✗ | ★★★★ | ✅ | QB: plug-and-produce (new) |
| 44 | LDAP/AD SSO | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: native LDAP/AD |
| 45 | PLC reuse (Wago/Siemens/Beckhoff) | ★★★ (via drivers) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: industrial-PC deployment (new) |
| COMPLIANCE & SECURITY | |||||
| 46 | FDA 21 CFR Part 11 | ★★★★ | ★★★★ | ⚠️ | Lucullus e-sigs today; QB partial (no e-sigs yet) |
| 47 | GAMP 5 classification | Category 5 (custom) | Category 4 | ✅ | QB: 50–70% less validation |
| 48 | Electronic signatures | ★★★★ | ★★ | ⚠️ | Lucullus today; QB roadmap Q3 2026 |
| 49 | ISA-18.2 alarm management | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: documented conformance |
| 50 | Audit trail | ★★★★ (Oracle logs) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: granular per-module module |
| 51 | Role-based access control | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: granular per-action RBAC |
| 52 | Safe Position Logic (GMP) | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: built-in configurable feature |
| 53 | Calibration management | ★★ (vendor tools) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: integrated calibration module |
| DEPLOYMENT & OPERATIONS | |||||
| 54 | Installation time | ★★ (hours–days) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: browser-based, no install |
| 55 | IT infrastructure required | ★★ (Windows + Oracle + network) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: host + PoE cables |
| 56 | Training requirement | ★★★ (formal courses) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: self-paced online portal |
| 57 | System integrator dependency | ★★ (often needed) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: $0, self-service |
| 58 | Remote access | ★★★ (VPN + RDP) | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: secure VPN + QR setup (new) |
| 59 | Health monitoring dashboard | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: consolidated module/host health (new) |
| COST & LICENSING | |||||
| 60 | Initial investment | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | 58–78% lower (4-bioreactor) |
| 61 | 5-year TCO | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | $75K–110K vs. $265K–345K |
| 62 | License model | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB perpetual; Lucullus recurring |
| 63 | Oracle / DB licensing | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: none |
| 64 | Vendor lock-in | ★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: open ecosystem |
| HARDWARE | |||||
| 65 | Own hardware ecosystem | ✗ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: native PoE modules |
| 66 | Native Hamilton / Mettler Toledo sensors | ★★★ | ★★★★★ | ✅ | QB: direct via QB Multisensor |
| 67 | Automated sampling hardware | ★★★★★ (Numera) | ★★★★ | Numera best-in-class for sample prep | |
| 68 | Photobioreactor lighting | ✗ | ★★★★ | ✅ | QB: QB Light, native |
Summary Scores by Category
| Category | Lucullus PIMS | QB Control | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Control | 3.6 | 4.7 | QB Control |
| Parallel Processing | 3.4 | 4.7 | QB Control |
| Recipe, Batch & Services | 3.4 | 4.9 | QB Control |
| Data Management & Analytics | 4.6 | 3.5 | Lucullus (Oracle, DoE, cross-experiment) |
| Integration | 3.5 | 4.7 | QB Control |
| Compliance & Security | 3.4 | 4.5 | QB Control (GAMP Cat 4; e-sigs trail Lucullus) |
| Deployment & Operations | 2.4 | 5.0 | QB Control |
Overall: QB Control wins in 6 of 7 categories for the target lab-to-pilot market. With its unified recipe block library, sequential auto-stop campaigns, native MTP, OPC-UA connector, secure remote access, Health Monitoring, and the industrial-PC deployment path, QB Control leads decisively in architecture, deployment, recipe/services, integration, compliance burden, and cost. Lucullus retains a strong lead in data management — Oracle-powered cross-experiment analytics, native DoE, and enterprise multi-site harmonization — making it the better choice for data-intensive process development and established heterogeneous fleets. Lucullus also leads on electronic signatures until QB Control’s Q3 2026 release.
Scoring reflects lab-to-pilot scale bioprocessing scenarios. Lucullus would score higher for enterprise multi-site and cross-experiment analytics use cases.
Recent QB Control Enhancements (current release)
The current QB Control release adds the capabilities referenced in this comparison (reflecting the current QB Control release):
- Batch scheduling — recurring (daily / weekly / interval) or one-time run schedules per batch, with a calendar view, named schedules, skip-on-conflict handling, and matching audit-trail records.
- Recipe portability — a recipe can be reassigned to a different process, automatically remapping its devices and services so a proven design moves between similar lines instead of being rebuilt.
- Equipment changes from the P&ID — lab equipment can be added directly in the P&ID editor (auto-creating the matching inventory and process records), with freeform note elements and anchor-point piping connections; lab equipment can also be added or removed on already-deployed processes without creating a new process version.
- Embedded OPC UA server — the OPC UA Connector can now run its own embedded OPC UA server, letting external OPC UA clients (e.g., MES, historians) read from QB Control directly.
- Expanded catalog — six additional tangential-flow (cross-flow) filtration services and six new lab-equipment types (including cooling chamber, filter cassette, hollow-fiber filter, and vials holder).
- Operations & safety — an alarm watchdog reconciling alarm state against live equipment values every 30 seconds; calibration that reserves the device during calibration (blocking conflicting operations); Protect / Interlock faceplate safeguards; audit-trail events filtered to the active license; and license-aware controls shown with explanatory tooltips.
- Usability — an in-app Help section with guided walkthroughs and searchable content across every module; search across inventory tables; and Health Monitoring showing system start time and uptime.
Legal Notice & Disclaimer
Versions compared. This comparison is between QB Control (release 6.x, per the current QB Control release notes) and Securecell Lucullus® version 24.x (current release; 2024 version-numbering scheme). Feature statements in this document refer to these versions.
Accuracy and currency. The information provided in this comparison is based on publicly available data gathered on 20 July 2026. While we strive to keep this information accurate and up to date, product features, pricing, and terms are subject to change by the respective manufacturers. We make no warranties regarding the absolute accuracy of the competitor data, and a later release may add, change, or remove capabilities described here.
Trademarks. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners. All company, product, and service names used in this document are for identification and comparison purposes only, and use of these names, trademarks, and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Lucullus®, Numera®, and Amphora® are trademarks of Securecell AG; Getinge® is a trademark of Getinge AB. QB Control and QB Systems are brands of A4BEE Sp. z o.o.
Transparency note. This comparison is prepared, owned, and operated by A4BEE Sp. z o.o., the creators of QB Systems and QB Control. It was created to highlight how our product differs from other options on the market, based on objective, verifiable features.
Purpose and limitation of liability. This comparison is provided for informational and educational purposes only, to help readers build knowledge of the options available to them. It is not an assessment, audit, ranking, benchmark, or endorsement of the technical expertise, quality, safety, or performance of Securecell Lucullus® or its vendor. A4BEE Sp. z o.o. assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content, nor for any decisions made based on this information; any reliance on the comparison is at the reader’s own risk.
Comparative-advertising basis. This document is intended to align with applicable comparative-advertising and fair-use rules, including EU Directive 2006/114/EC and US nominative-fair-use principles: it compares products intended for the same needs, relies on material, relevant, verifiable, and representative features, and is not intended to mislead or to denigrate any competitor. Where a competitor capability could not be verified from public sources, it is identified as such. If you believe any statement is inaccurate or out of date, please contact [email protected] and it will be reviewed and corrected promptly.
Assumptions
To keep the comparison transparent and fair, the following assumptions and estimates were applied:
- Third-party capabilities are interpreted from public vendor datasheets, brochures, manuals, and websites current at the analysis date. Where a capability was not clearly documented publicly, it is described as such (“not clearly documented,” “appears limited,” etc.) rather than asserted or denied.
- Competitor pricing and total-cost-of-ownership figures are indicative estimates derived from public information and typical configurations — not vendor quotations or list prices.
- QB Control reference figures are indicative, based on past quotations, and do not constitute a specific priced offer.
- The comparison assumes a lab-to-pilot bioprocessing context (roughly 150 mL–50 L, plus stainless-steel pilot/production via PLC over OPC-UA); conclusions may differ at large multi-train production scale.
- “QB Control” reflects the current released version at the analysis date; third-party products reflect the newest versions identified in public sources.
Sources
QB Control capabilities referenced in this document reflect QB Control release 6.x (current release).
Product and brand names listed below are trademarks of their respective owners (attributed in the Legal Notice & Disclaimer) and are used here for identification and comparison purposes only.
- Securecell AG — Lucullus® SCADA Software
- Getinge — Lucullus® PIMS Product Page
- Securecell — Event-Based Process Control
- Securecell — IntegraOne Solution
- Securecell — Numera® & Lucullus® PAT Integration
- Securecell — Amphora® Multi-Feed Control
- Securecell — Getinge Partnership (10 Years)
- Securecell — Lucullus® REST API (community library)
- Securecell — TU Wien Case Study
- ISA-88 Batch Control Standard (ISA)
- ISA-18.2 Alarm Management Standard (ISA)
- FDA 21 CFR Part 11 — Electronic Records & Signatures
- EU Annex 11 — Computerised Systems (EudraLex Vol. 4)
Analysis prepared July 2026 | Version 1.0 (v1-July) | QB Systems vs. Lucullus PIMS competitive positioning QB Systems — Flexible. Innovative. Limitless. | A product brand of A4BEE Sp. z o.o. | https://qb.systems