Comparison · QB Control vs. Lucullus PIMS

QB Control vs Lucullus PIMS Comparison

At a glance

Dimension QB Control Lucullus PIMS
Software platform Browser-based (any modern browser) Windows desktop client-server
Database Local on QB Edge, no external DB Oracle (XE or full enterprise)
Hardware 20+ purpose-built PoE modules Third-party bioreactors + controllers
Device integration Auto-discovery + OPC-UA connector Custom driver development per device
Client install None (any browser) Windows app + Oracle client
IT infrastructure QB Edge + PoE cabling Windows Server, Oracle DB, drivers

Table of Contents

  1. Executive Summary
  2. Platform Philosophy
  3. Architecture & Hardware
  4. Parallel Processing
  5. Multi-Vendor Integration
  6. Software Module Comparison
  7. Services Catalog & Rapid Deployment
  8. Recipe Engine
  9. Regulatory Compliance
  10. Pricing, Licensing & TCO
  11. Industry Fit Analysis
  12. What QB Control Can Replace
  13. Where QB Control Creates Superior Value
  14. Gaps & Limitations
  15. Migration & Replacement Scenarios
  16. Competitive Positioning Strategy
  17. Feature-by-Feature Matrix

Appendices — Summary Scores by Category · Sources


1. Executive Summary

The Core Argument

Securecell’s Lucullus PIMS (Process Information Management System) is the bioprocess industry’s most established software-only data-integration and process-control layer — over 25 years of continuous development, deep multi-vendor connectivity, mature design-of-experiments (DoE) integration, sample and media management, and enterprise-scale data warehousing on an Oracle database. QB Control is a SCADA-class, browser-based platform purpose-built for liquid-handling bioprocessing, combining co-engineered hardware (QB Modules) and software with ~40 pre-built bioprocess services, a visual recipe engine, native sensors, and built-in compliance modules. It deploys both on QB Edge (benchtop QB Modules) and on a standard industrial PC driving stainless-steel, PLC-based systems via OPC-UA.

The two products solve different problems. Lucullus is a middleware data layer that sits on top of existing third-party bioreactors and controllers — its value is connecting to everything, centralizing the data, and enabling cross-experiment analysis. It owns no process hardware and depends on driver development for each new device. QB Control ships the bioprocess application and the hardware already built — turnkey from the bench, with an OPC-UA path that also lets it monitor and control third-party OPC-UA equipment. The comparison is most relevant in lab-to-pilot bioprocessing (150 mL – 50 L benchtop, plus stainless-steel pilot/production via PLC), where Lucullus’s infrastructure overhead becomes a burden and QB Control delivers a right-sized, unified alternative.

Key Finding

QB Control does not replace Lucullus PIMS in all scenarios. It replaces Lucullus in specific, high-value segments where Lucullus’s Oracle dependency, driver-development cycle, integrator reliance, and software-only architecture create friction. With the industrial-PC deployment path and the OPC-UA connector, QB Control’s addressable footprint extends from greenfield benchtop labs up into stainless-steel pilot cells and retrofitted legacy hardware. Lucullus retains a genuine lead in cross-experiment analytics, DoE, established multi-vendor breadth, and enterprise multi-site data harmonization. The sweet spot for QB Control as a Lucullus alternative is:

ScenarioQB Control Replaces Lucullus?Value Driver
Greenfield lab (1–12 bioreactors)Full replacementUnified hardware + software, days vs. weeks setup
Academic / teaching labFull replacementZero IT overhead, no Oracle, browser UI
Small R&D lab (1–6 bioreactors)Strong replacementTurnkey control, perpetual license, no DBA
Pilot scale (10–50 L, new build)Strong replacementOne vendor, lower TCO, native modules
Retrofit of OPC-UA-enabled bioreactorsStrong replacementOPC-UA connector controls Sartorius, etc.
Stainless-steel pilot cell with PLCStrong replacement (new)Industrial-PC deployment + OPC-UA
Adding vessels to an existing Lucullus lab⚠️ Partial / complementaryQB for new standalone vessels; Lucullus keeps data continuity
DoE-heavy process developmentNot a replacementLucullus native DoE integration required
Enterprise multi-site data harmonizationNot a replacementCentralized Oracle warehouse required

2. Platform Philosophy

Fundamental Architecture Difference

DimensionLucullus PIMSQB Control
Product CategorySoftware-only PIMS / process-control layerSCADA-class browser-based hardware+software platform
Design PhilosophyConnect to everything, centralize all dataHardware and software designed as one system
Target ScaleLab to enterprise (vendor-dependent)Lab-to-pilot (150 mL – 50 L benchtop); stainless-steel pilot/production via PLC + OPC-UA
Approach to HardwareNone — connects to 3rd-party bioreactors via driversOwn modular hardware (QB Modules) + open sensors; or existing PLCs (Wago/Siemens/Beckhoff)
Software DeliveryWindows desktop client-server applicationBrowser-based (any device, any OS)
Deployment HostWindows / Windows Server + Oracle DBQB Edge for benchtop or standard industrial PC for PLC-based stainless steel
DatabaseOracle (XE standalone → full Oracle enterprise)Embedded data store on the deployment host — no external DB
Configuration ModelPer-device driver + script/form-based recipesVisual no-code flow + recipe designer
Deployment TimeWeeks (Oracle, drivers, integrator)Days (plug-and-play / OPC-UA mapping)
Vendor StrategyVendor-agnostic via drivers (integrator-led)Open ecosystem (no lock-in) + native modules
GAMP ClassificationCategory 5 (custom, device-specific drivers)Category 4 (configurable software)

The “Universal Translator” Problem

Lucullus was born from a real need: unify data from heterogeneous bioprocess equipment so scientists can compare runs across vessels, scales, and vendors. Its philosophy — connect to everything, centralize all data, enable cross-experiment analysis — assumes the lab already owns bioreactors (Sartorius, Getinge/Applikon, Eppendorf, Infors, etc.) and needs a software layer to translate, monitor, and warehouse them. That makes Lucullus a powerful middleware platform, but it also makes every deployment dependent on:

  • An Oracle database (XE for standalone, full Oracle for enterprise) with the licensing and administration that implies
  • Custom driver development for each new device type (typically weeks per device)
  • Windows workstations and servers, OPC gateways, and corporate IT governance
  • A system integrator for setup, configuration, and validation

Lucullus is like a universal TV remote that can control any brand of TV — powerful, but it must be programmed for each new device, and it owns none of the hardware it commands. QB Control was designed with the opposite philosophy: hardware and software are one system. Every QB Module (pump, sensor, agitator, gas-flow controller, thermo unit, valve, scale) communicates natively with QB Control over PoE — no drivers to write, no Oracle to maintain, no integration project. And because QB Control also speaks OPC-UA (with a dedicated connector), it can reach beyond the QB ecosystem to monitor and control third-party OPC-UA equipment — controlling other brands when needed, while remaining turnkey for its own.

QB Control further provides centralized multi-processing: multiple processes run simultaneously from one host, each with its own auto-generated P&ID/HMI — no need to integrate data from separate controllers after the fact, which is precisely the problem Lucullus was built to solve.


3. Architecture & Hardware

Controller & Hardware Architecture

ComponentLucullus PIMSQB Control
Software platformWindows desktop application (client-server)Browser-based (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari)
Central hostWindows / Windows Server + Oracle DBQB Edge (runs QB Control locally) or industrial PC for PLC-based stainless-steel systems
DatabaseOracle (XE standalone → full Oracle enterprise)Embedded data store on the host — no external DB required
Hardware dependencyThird-party bioreactors + controllersQB Modules (own PoE devices); or existing PLCs via OPC-UA
ControllerExisting bioreactor controllers (Getinge i-Control / ez-Control / my-Control, Sartorius, etc.)QB Edge or industrial PC
I/O architectureOPC / serial drivers to external controllersPower-over-Ethernet (one cable = power + data per module); or PLC I/O via OPC-UA
Device discoveryManual driver development / commissioning per deviceAuto-discovery (plug-and-play) for QB Modules; OPC-UA mapping for third-party
Workstation requirementWindows client + Oracle client per seatAny device with a browser
Deployment editionsStandalone (up to 8 bioreactors), Client-Server, Enterprise (multi-site)Single QB Edge (expandable via QB Switch); or industrial PC for PLC systems
Power architectureMultiple UPS units, separate circuitsPoE — single cable per module, no external supplies
WiringNetwork (Oracle ↔ workstation), RS232/RS485 to controllers, custom adaptersSingle Ethernet cable per module; or existing PLC field wiring

QB Modules Hardware Ecosystem vs. Lucullus 3rd-Party Integration

Lucullus operates as software only and manufactures no process hardware. It connects to third-party bioreactor controllers, sensors, pumps, and analyzers through device-specific drivers — so every new device type requires Securecell (or the customer) to develop or commission a driver. QB Control supplies the hardware natively:

FunctionLucullus ApproachQB Control Approach
Pumps3rd-party pumps via drivers (Ismatec, Cole-Parmer, etc.)QB Pump (peristaltic 3-/4-roller, centrifugal) + QB Syringe Pump — native; SmartPump (OPC) for 3rd-party
SensorsHamilton / Mettler Toledo via vendor tools + driversQB Multisensor — up to 6 Hamilton / Mettler Toledo probes natively
Agitation3rd-party agitators via controller driversQB Agitator, QB Multiagitator (2 or 6 vessels) — native
Temperature3rd-party thermocontrollers via driversQB Thermo (heating/cooling, heating mats) — native
Gas Flow3rd-party MFCs via driversQB Gasflow (dual mass-flow controllers) — native
Valves3rd-party valves via controller driversQB Pinch Valve, QB Selector Valve (24 positions) — native
Scales3rd-party scales via serial driversQB Multiscale (up to 6 scales) — native
Foam DetectionExternal, vendor-dependentQB Foam Sensor — optical, non-contact
LightingNot part of the Lucullus ecosystemQB Light (LED control for photobioreactors)
Pressure3rd-party transmitters via driversQB Pressure Sensor (single-use IBP transducers)
Automated SamplingNumera — Securecell’s companion sampling/sample-prep hardwareQB Syringe Pump + QB Selector Valve — native sampling service
Bioreactor vessels3rd-party (any vendor)QB Tanks (1 L, 3 L, custom to ~10 L); stainless-steel via PLC

Network & Infrastructure Requirements

RequirementLucullus PIMSQB Control
Database administrationOracle DBA required — licensing, backup/recovery, schema, query tuningNone — embedded data store, automatic backups
OS patching & updatesMonthly security patches, AV management across all client machinesFirmware updates via web UI (infrequent, non-disruptive)
OPC licensing & gatewaysOPC server license + gateway maintenance + driver versioningNative protocol support; no OPC-UA licensing
Network architectureCorporate IT governance, VLANs, firewalls for DB access, VPNPlug-and-play PoE switch + single Ethernet cable per module
IT staffingDatabase admin (partial FTE) + systems admin + escalationsMinimal — device self-manages; browser access only
Backup & disaster recoveryOracle DB backups, transaction logs, recovery testingScheduled/manual backup wizards + one-click restore
Remote monitoringVPN tunneling, Windows RDP, firewall exceptionsSecure VPN with QR-code setup; HTTPS browser access
New device onboardingContact Securecell → custom driver development (weeks)Auto-discovery in minutes; OPC-UA endpoint mapping in hours

Key insight: Lucullus was architected when “software + infrastructure” was a bundle — IT and database expertise were assumed. QB Control eliminates the infrastructure layer entirely, shifting the model from “hire a DBA and a system integrator” to “plug in a cable” — or, for stainless-steel pilots, “deploy on an industrial PC and point it at your existing PLC over OPC-UA.”


4. Parallel Processing

Side-by-Side Comparison

CapabilityLucullus PIMSQB Control
Multi-bioreactor controlUp to 8 standalone; unlimited with Client-Server/EnterpriseMultiple parallel processes (license-dependent), centralized from one host
Centralized multi-processingAggregates from multiple separate controllers after the fact✅ All processes run from one host — no inter-controller data integration
Dynamic P&ID per processManual HMI setup per controller/vessel✅ Auto-generated plug-and-play P&ID/HMI per process
Independent recipes per vesselYes — different recipes across reactorsYes — different recipes per process; parallel and sequential execution
Sequential campaign queuingProcess planning / reactor allocationSequential batch execution with Pending queue + per-batch auto-stop (new)
Cross-reactor data comparison★★★★★ — Oracle-based cross-experiment analytics (core strength)★★★ — per-process graphs with multi-signal overlay + CSV export
Scaling modelAdd bioreactors from any vendor, connect via driversAdd QB Modules via PoE / expand via QB Switch; 3rd-party via OPC-UA
Independent process controlEach reactor independently controlledEach process independent with its own P&ID, services, and per-process P-Stop
Shared resource managementScheduling tools for shared equipmentProcess-level allocation via System and Process modules; conflict blockade

QB Control’s Parallel Processing Model

QB Control implements parallel processing through its System → Process → Batch hierarchy:

  1. System defines the physical resources (devices, services, equipment, media)
  2. Multiple Processes can be defined within a system, each with its own auto-generated P&ID, alarm configuration, recipe assignment, batch recording, and reports
  3. Multi-instance services allow the same service type to be instantiated across multiple processes
  4. Parallel recipe execution — multiple recipes run simultaneously across different processes
  5. Sequential execution (new) — batches queue with a Pending status and chain with auto-stop conditions for unattended campaign sequencing
  6. Process-level isolation — each process operates independently with its own control loop and its own per-process emergency stop (P-Stop)

Where QB Control Excels in Parallel Processing

  • No system integrator needed to set up parallel operations
  • Visual P&ID per process — auto-generated from configuration, not manually drawn; preserved on versioning
  • Process & recipe Import/Export with device mapping — replicate a proven setup to new bioreactors and remap devices to the target system instantly
  • Multi-user concurrent access — different operators monitor/control different processes from different devices
  • Lower incremental cost — adding a parallel bioreactor = adding QB Modules + license expansion, not buying new controllers, Windows seats, or an integrator engagement

Where Lucullus Excels in Parallel Processing

  • Cross-experiment data analytics is unmatched: because everything lives in one Oracle database, scientists can query, compare, and overlay data from hundreds of past runs across vessel types and scales — its core value proposition
  • Practically unlimited vessel count at Client-Server/Enterprise editions
  • Shared-equipment scheduling across heterogeneous, multi-vendor fleets
  • Established multi-vendor parallel fleets already running on Lucullus drivers

5. Multi-Vendor Integration

Protocol Support Comparison

ProtocolLucullus PIMSQB Control
OPC UAServer and client (data exchange)Native — primary path for PLC/stainless-steel integration; dedicated OPC UA Connector with configurable mappings; full control of OPC-UA equipment
OPC DA / serial driversNative (RS232/RS485 + custom drivers)Serial supported (QB Multiscale/Multisensor); legacy OPC DA not primary
ModbusVia driversNative (TCP and RTU)
MQTTNot a documented primary protocolNative — IoT real-time streaming
REST APILucullus REST API (documented, Python library)Native — modern web integrations
SQL (JDBC/ODBC)Via Oracle (full SQL power)Native — direct access to the embedded data store
LDAP/Active DirectoryBasic user managementNative — SSO with corporate credentials, configurable search scope
MTP (Module Type Package)Not documentedSupported (new) — plug-and-produce integration + MTP signal presentation in Graphs
SMTP (email)Notifications (limited documentation)Native — notification dispatch with SMTP config + delivery logs
PROFIBUS / PROFINETVia controller driversProfibus supported; PLC protocols (Wago/Siemens/Beckhoff)
Secured external communicationVia VPN/DMZ/gatewaysSupported — encrypted, protected external traffic; secure VPN

Sensor & Bioreactor Vendor Support Comparison

VendorLucullus PIMSQB Control
Sartorius / Getinge / Applikon / Eppendorf / Infors bioreactorsNative breadth — 25+ years of driver library across dozens of vendorsVia OPC-UA connector (control of OPC-UA-enabled equipment); native QB hardware for new vessels
HamiltonVia vendor tools + driversNative — via QB Multisensor (DO, pH, conductivity, OD, CO₂, ORP); two-point/zero-point/slope calibration
Mettler ToledoVia vendor tools + driversNative — ISM/Modbus via QB Multisensor
LevitronixCustom integrationNative — flow meters via QB Multisensor
Numera (automated sampling)Native — best-in-class sample prep (filtration, dilution)QB Syringe Pump + QB Selector Valve — native alternative

Integration Philosophy Difference

Lucullus: “We are the universal data and control layer. Bring any bioreactor from any vendor; we connect it via a driver, monitor and control it, and warehouse all of its data in Oracle for cross-experiment analysis. New device types require a driver, built by us or commissioned through us.”

QB Control: “We provide both the control platform AND the hardware modules. Our modules natively connect Hamilton, Mettler Toledo, and Levitronix sensors with no drivers. For third-party bioreactors and PLCs, we offer a dedicated OPC-UA connector, plus Modbus, MQTT, REST API, SQL, and MTP — and we deploy on your existing PLCs for stainless-steel systems. No Oracle, no per-device driver project, no integrator.”

QB Control’s Integration Advantage

  1. Native sensor support — Hamilton and Mettler Toledo probes connect directly to QB Multisensor. No vendor middleware, no per-device drivers
  2. Modern protocols — MQTT, REST API, and SQL are native. Streaming bioreactor data to a cloud lake is a broker configuration, not a custom ETL project
  3. OPC UA Connector — a dedicated module bridges OPC-UA equipment (e.g., Sartorius bioreactors) into QB Control with configurable mappings — full control, not just data exchange — making QB Control a modern retrofit platform for legacy hardware
  4. MTP support (new) — plug-and-produce modular integration
  5. Auto-discovery vs. manual driver commissioning — plug in a QB Module and it appears in inventory automatically

Lucullus’s Integration Advantage

  1. Driver-library breadth — 25+ years of connectors for Sartorius, Getinge/Applikon, Eppendorf, Infors, and dozens more, including non-OPC legacy equipment QB cannot reach over OPC-UA
  2. Mature Getinge/Applikon partnership (10+ years) with deeply tested integrations
  3. Extensive analytical-device support — offline/online analyzers, DSP devices, incubators
  4. Numera + Amphora — purpose-built automated sampling, sample prep, and gravimetric multi-feed hardware
  5. Proven at production and enterprise scale with complex, heterogeneous, multi-vendor installations

6. Software Module Comparison

Module-by-Module Mapping

QB Control ships 18 software modules, accessed through the Portal. The two additions since the previous comparison are Remote Access and Health Monitoring.

Capability AreaLucullus ComponentQB Control ModuleComparison
Device ManagementDevice management + driver setupInventory (auto-discovery, device status, configuration import/export, licensing)QB simpler & faster (no drivers)
System ConfigurationSystem configurationSystem (visual resource allocation, search, bulk add/remove, history to CSV)QB no-code, visual
Process ConfigurationProcess planning + reactor allocationProcess (visual binding, versioning, duplicate, live connection status, guided import/export)QB faster; Lucullus adds DoE planning
Process VisualizationProcess visualization (manual HMI screens)P&ID (auto-generated, drag-and-drop, recipe execution from diagram, P-Stop/E-Stop)QB auto-generates; Lucullus manual
Batch ManagementRecipe management with event-based controlRecipe (Designer / Batch / Executions Boards)QB visual designer with Services
Services CatalogNo equivalent (per-device configuration)Services (~40 templates across 10 categories, load & execute in minutes)QB unique advantage
Service ProfilesNo equivalentService Profiles (reusable grouped/atomic parameter templates, portable import/export)QB unique advantage
Alarm ManagementAlarm managementAlarms (ISA-18.2 conformance, watchlist, in-app global notifications)QB explicitly ISA-18.2
Data VisualizationData visualization + trendingGraphs (live + history, multi-axis, annotations, MTP signals, export)Lucullus stronger cross-experiment; QB per-process real-time
ReportingAutomatic batch report generationReports (automated + manual, PDF/DOCX, recipe-execution & service-history sections)Comparable
Batch TrackingBatch execution trackingRuns (per-process, batch ID, user tracking, report linkage)Comparable
CalibrationDevice-vendor tools (not a core module)Calibration (status tracking, Next Due Dates, Hamilton/pump methods)QB integrated; Lucullus external
Audit TrailAudit trail via Oracle DBAudit Trail (21 CFR Part 11 conformance, cross-module, exportable CSV)Both strong; QB purpose-built module
Access ControlUser managementUsers & Roles (RBAC, granular per-module permissions, LDAP/AD)QB more granular & modern
NotificationsNotifications (limited documentation)Notifications (in-app center, email/SMTP, per-user preferences, recipe-step alerts, logs)QB richer out-of-box
BackupDatabase backup (Oracle utilities)Backup, Export & Archive (scheduled/manual wizards, one-click restore, integrity verification)QB purpose-built; Lucullus relies on DBA tools
License ManagementLicense managementLicense (feature/device/system/time-based, online/offline, host-bound, license guards)QB more flexible
Remote AccessVPN + Windows RDPRemote Access (secure VPN, QR-code setup, phone/tablet/PC, role-based) — newQB simpler, multi-device
Health MonitoringDiagnostics across toolsHealth Monitoring (system health dashboard, per-module status, drill-down) — newQB consolidated, always-on
DoE IntegrationNative 3rd-party DoE integration❌ Not available (export via REST/CSV)Lucullus wins
Sample ManagementBarcode tracking, at-line analyzer retrieval◐ Manual via InventoryLucullus wins
Media ManagementAutomated media creation, raw-material tracking◐ Manual via InventoryLucullus wins
Cross-Experiment AnalyticsOracle-powered multi-run comparison◐ Per-process graphs + CSV exportLucullus wins

7. Services Catalog & Rapid Deployment

QB Control’s Services Catalog — A Game-Changing Differentiator

One of QB Control’s most powerful advantages over Lucullus is the Services Catalog — a library of pre-built, parameterized service templates that can be loaded and executed within minutes. A Service is a pre-defined control action that directly commands hardware. Services come in two types:

  • Autocomplete Services — execute a discrete task and close automatically (e.g., Transfer Volume by Pump, Set Sparger Volume & Mass Flow)
  • Continuous Services — run until explicitly stopped (e.g., Set Agitator Speed, Temperature Control by TCU, pH Control by Base & CO₂)

Lucullus, by contrast, provides process control but has no equivalent template library that works out of the box — each control strategy must be configured per device based on the connected controller’s capabilities and Lucullus drivers. Event-based control is possible but requires configuring triggers, conditions, and actions specific to the connected hardware.

Services Catalog by Category

QB Control ships with ~40 pre-built service templates across 10 functional categories out of the box, with QB Filtration adding a tangential-flow filtration set (recently expanded). This covers every core bioprocess control need:

CategoryExample ServicesCountTypes
pH ControlpH Control by Base & CO₂, by Base & Acid, by One Pump, One Pump PID, pH PID Control6Continuous
Temperature Controlby TCU, by Heating Mat, by Steam & Water, Split Temp, Set Circulator Temp, Set Heating Mat Power6Continuous
Pump & FeedFeed, Autosubstrate, Set Pump Flow Rate, Set Centrifugal Pump RPM, Transfer Volume/Bolus, Gravimetric Feeding9Continuous + Autocomplete
Gas ControlO₂ Control, Advanced O₂ Control, Set MFC Flow, Set Sparger Mass Flow4Continuous
Gas Volume DeliverySet Sparger Volume & Mass Flow1Autocomplete
SamplingAutomated Sampling, Sample by Syringe Pump, Sampler Cleaning3Continuous + Autocomplete
Stirring & AgitationStirring, Set Agitator Speed2Continuous
Foam ControlFoam Control, Foam Control by Antifoam Reagent2Continuous
Valve ControlSet Selector Valve Position, Set Valve Position2Continuous
LED & LightLED Control, LED Control Scheduler2Continuous
Core catalog (out of the box)~40across 10 categories
QB Filtration add-onFiltervig Control, Concentration Factor Logic, NWP Calculator, Breakthrough Detection, plus six new tangential-flow servicesexpandedContinuous + Autocomplete

Service Profiles — Reusable Parameter Templates

QB Control’s Service Profiles let users save standardized parameter configurations as reusable templates with grouped and atomic-style configuration models, structured profile cards (e.g., PID Controller Tuning, Temperature Ramp, Operating Limits), and portable export/import to transfer complete profile sets between templates or environments. Profile-driven values are labeled in execution review for traceability — so an operator can switch strategies or adjust parameters in minutes without re-engineering control logic.

Deployment Time Comparison

ActivityLucullus PIMSQB Control
Install softwareHours (Windows, Oracle, client)0 — browser-based, pre-installed on host
Connect first bioreactor (QB hardware)Days–weeks (driver development/verification)Minutes (plug PoE cable, auto-discovery)
Connect third-party bioreactor (OPC-UA)Days–weeks (driver development)Hours (configure OPC-UA connector endpoint)
Configure first control loopHours (driver + recipe + alarm setup)Minutes (select service template, apply profile)
Switch pH-by-CO₂ → pH-by-acidReconfigure recipe/control logicSelect a different service template — minutes
Add a second identical vesselHours (duplicate config, verify)Minutes (plug in modules, assign to process)
Go from zero to running experimentWeeks (typical, with integrator support)Hours to days (self-service)

8. Recipe Engine

Overview

The Recipe Module is the core automation engine of QB Control. It translates biotechnological protocols into executable digital workflows by combining logic blocks and Services (hardware actions), through three integrated boards: Designer Board (create/edit), Batch Board (configure/execute), and Executions Board (monitor history). Lucullus provides recipe management with event-based triggers, but its model is form/script-based and tied to per-device driver configuration.

8.1 Designer Board & the Unified Block Library

The Designer Board is a visual, drag-and-drop workspace for building process logic as a connected flow. QB Control consolidates per-service blocks into a unified block library with built-in grouping, descriptions, tooltips, and embedded in-app guidance:

BlockCategoryFunction
Start ServiceService ControlSingle configurable block; pick the service at configuration; supports Autocomplete (run-to-completion) and Continuous (keep running)
Stop ServiceService ControlExplicitly stop a continuous service later in the flow
Update Service InputsService ControlChange service input values mid-execution (startup vs. runtime-adjustable inputs kept separate)
Service Profile supportService ControlStart/Update blocks accept preset profile configurations; profile values labeled in execution review
Manual OperationOperationsPause for operator-driven action where supervised intervention is required
Variable / Update VariablesVariablesDeclare named values (boolean, text, number, time); update with increase / decrease / multiply / divide
TimerTimingShared timer control with start / stop / pause / resume modes
Set Valve StateEquipment commandsCommand valve positions directly as part of the sequence
ConditionalLogic & flowEvaluate real-time variables with AND / OR expressions
CounterLogic & flowLoop control with iteration count
PIDLogic & flowInline PID-oriented control block
PolygonLogic & flowPiecewise-linear mapping (X→Y) for ramps and profiles
Split / MergeLogic & flowFork into parallel paths and join them back together
Start / Stop / EndStandardExecution control endpoints for the flow

Authoring productivity: copy/paste of blocks, signal filtering for cleaner input selection, undo/redo, diagram export (image), and recipe import/export across installations.

8.2 Recipe Lifecycle & Governance

Recipe state lifecycle: Draft → Verified → Validated → Hold → Archived. Critically, only Verified or Validated recipes can run in batches — not just Validated — which streamlines development without weakening control. Recipes can be duplicated for rapid variation, and the designer flags inactive recipes that should not be started as-is. Lucullus does not document an equivalent color-coded state model.

8.3 Batch Board

  • Create batches for processes and assign single or multiple recipes per batch
  • Real-time view to monitor and control execution (stop, pause, resume)
  • Sequential batch execution with Pending status for queued batches and auto-stop configuration per batch
  • Edit parameters from the execution board where permitted — no round-trip to the designer mid-run
  • Step execution counts and live recipe status updates
  • Single recipe → batch and multiple recipes → batch (user-defined sequence or parallel), all recorded with full traceability

8.4 Executions Board

  • List of executed batches with start/finish time, status, and configuration
  • Statuses: During Execution, Paused, Hold, Pending, Completed, Failed, Aborted
  • Filter by System, Process, Status; export list to CSV; export recipe flow to PNG
  • Direct links to the live view of currently executing recipes

8.5 Validation & Safety

  • The Validator — visual workspace for verifying recipe logic before execution
  • Automated pre-start validations prevent batch collisions, unauthorized recipe starts, and execution on disconnected hardware
  • Mandatory pre-execution checklist forces operators to verify critical lab elements (tubing integrity, media preparation) before start
  • License guard — creating, duplicating, or importing recipes is blocked when the recipe license limit is reached
  • Emergency integration — runs hold or abort safely when a P-Stop or global E-Stop is active

8.6 Recipe Engine vs. Lucullus — Detailed Comparison

CapabilityLucullus PIMSQB Control Recipe Engine
Workflow designForm/script-based with event triggersVisual drag-and-drop Designer Board (no coding)
Recipe versioningNot documented in detailDraft → Verified → Validated → Hold → Archived
Recipe import/export✓ — full recipe import/export across installations
Process import/exportLimited✓ — complete process config (devices, services, recipes, P&ID) + device mapping
Conditional logicEvent triggers on sensor readingsConditional blocks with AND/OR on real-time data
Variables & mathConfigurable per controllerVariable / Update Variables (increase/decrease/multiply/divide)
TimersEvent-based schedulingTimer block (start/stop/pause/resume)
Human-in-the-loopConfigurable promptsManual Operation block
Event-based control★★★★★ — sophisticated triggers + Numera integration★★★★ — Conditional, sensor-based services
DoE integration★★★★★ — native 3rd-party DoE★★ — export via REST/CSV
Pre-execution safetyNot documented as system-enforcedMandatory checklist + Validator (system-enforced)
Sequential campaignsProcess planning / reactor allocationSequential batches with Pending queue + auto-stop
Parallel recipe execution✓ — user chooses sequence or parallel mode
Diagram exportNot standardExport as image / PNG for compliance docs
Time to create a recipeHours to daysMinutes to hours (visual, no-code)

9. Regulatory Compliance

StandardLucullus PIMSQB ControlNotes
FDA 21 CFR Part 11Supported — electronic records, audit trail via Oracle⚠️ Partial conformanceLucullus supports e-records and e-signatures for regulated environments. QB: electronic records, audit trails, access control, RBAC, data integrity today — electronic signatures not yet covered
EU Annex 11Supported (implied by pharma installed base)✅ Compliance supportBoth provide computerized-system validation capabilities
GAMP 5Category 5 (custom, device-specific drivers)Category 4 (configurable)QB Control has lower validation burden — no custom code to validate
ISA-18.2 (Alarms)Not explicitly documented✅ ConformanceQB supports suppressed, out-of-service, acknowledgement workflows
ISA-88 (Batch)Partial — recipe-based batch control⚠️ Follows batch concepts; not formally certifiedComparable at lab/pilot scale
ALCOA+ (Data Integrity)Oracle structured, traceable storage✅ Full implementationBoth provide ALCOA+ data integrity
Electronic SignaturesSupported (for regulated environments)On roadmap (Q3 2026 — not in current version)Lucullus leads today; QB planned
Audit TrailVia Oracle database logging✅ Purpose-built module, cross-module, exportable CSVBoth comprehensive; QB granular per-module
Role-Based Access ControlUser management with access control✅ Granular RBAC with per-module, per-action permissions, LDAP/ADQB more granular
Safe Position Logic (GMP)Via controller/interlock engineering✅ Built-in — define safe actuator states after restart/power cycleQB has a dedicated, configurable feature
CE MarkingSystem-level (via 3rd-party hardware)✅ Per QB Module (EMC + Low Voltage Directive)Each module ships its own Declaration of Conformity

Compliance Value for QB Control

GAMP 5 Category 4 vs. Category 5 is the critical differentiator. Lucullus’s device-specific drivers constitute custom code (Category 5) that must be validated individually for every unique hardware combination, whereas QB Control is configured through UI settings, service templates, and service profiles — the same validated software runs on every host. The result is roughly 50–70% less validation documentation than a Lucullus installation with multiple device drivers, with faster IQ/OQ/PQ (weeks vs. months), lower CSV cost, and simpler change management (configuration, not code; firmware updates do not trigger re-validation).

Honest Compliance Caveat

QB Control’s 21 CFR Part 11 conformance is partial: it delivers electronic records, audit trails, access control, RBAC, and data integrity today, but electronic signatures are not yet implemented (roadmapped for Q3 2026). Lucullus, deployed in regulated pharma environments for years, supports electronic signatures today. For workflows that require digital signatures on an active IND now, Lucullus (or another e-signature-capable system) remains the safer choice until QB Control’s e-signature release. Do not represent QB Control as fully 21 CFR Part 11 compliant.


10. Pricing, Licensing & TCO

Direct Cost Comparison

Cost ComponentLucullus PIMS (Estimated)QB ControlSavings with QB
Software license~$30,000–80,000+ (edition & bioreactor count)Included with QB hardware (perpetual license)Significant
Oracle database license$0 (XE standalone) → $10,000–50,000+ (full Oracle)$0 — no external database100%
Bioreactor hardwareThird-party — $30,000–100,000+ per bioreactorQB Modules included in system priceSignificant
Driver development$5,000–20,000 per device type (custom drivers)$0 — QB Modules auto-discover100%
System integrator$10,000–50,000+ (install, config, validation)$0 — self-service plug-and-play100%
Windows Server license$500–2,000$0 — runs its own OS / industrial PC100%
Annual maintenance/support~15–25% of license cost per yearOptional tiered support (Basic/Standard/Premium)Significant
Training$5,000–15,000 (formal Securecell courses)QB Systems Online Portal + docs (self-paced, included)80–90%
Validation (GAMP 5)Category 5 — extensive IQ/OQ/PQCategory 4 — reduced scope50–70%

QB Control System Pricing (Reference Figures, USD)

ConfigurationQB Control Price
Entry-level system (1 bioreactor)$15,000–25,000
4-bioreactor lab setup$60,000–85,000
6-bioreactor lab setup~$100,000 (hardware)
Pilot setup (8–12 bioreactors)$150,000–250,000
System integrator cost$0 (self-setup, plug-and-play)
Workstation hardware$0 (any device with a browser)

Total Cost of Ownership (5-Year Projection)

Scenario: 4-bioreactor lab

Cost ComponentLucullus PIMSQB Control
Software license$50,000$0 (included)
Oracle DB (standalone XE)$0$0
Bioreactor hardware (4 vessels + controllers)$120,000–200,000$60,000–85,000 (all-inclusive)
Driver integration$15,000$0
System integrator / installation$20,000$0
Windows Server + workstations$3,000$0
5-year maintenance (software)$37,500 (~15%/yr)$15,000–25,000 (support tier)
5-year database administration$10,000$0
Training$10,000$0 (online portal)
5-Year Total$265,500–345,500$75,000–110,000
~58–78% lower TCO

Note: Lucullus pricing is estimated based on typical enterprise bioprocess software costs. Securecell does not publish list prices; actual costs vary by configuration, region, and negotiation. QB Control prices are reference figures based on past quotations and do not constitute a specific priced offer.

Licensing Model Comparison

AspectLucullus PIMSQB Control
ModelAnnual or subscription (typical enterprise software) + OraclePerpetual — feature-, device-, system/process-, and time-based dimensions
License TypeRecurring renewalPerpetual — buy once; no recurring license fees
Per-bioreactor licensingCommonly by bioreactor count or edition tierDevice- and feature-based
SupportAnnual maintenance (% of license)Paid separately — tiered (Basic/Standard/Premium), client’s choice
EnforcementLicense management + OracleSoftware license bound to the deployment host; license-aware UI and guards
Upgrade pathPaid version upgradesSoftware updates via the management interface
Lock-inOracle + Windows + driver dependencyNot tied to a specific hardware vendor

Licensing Model — Key Client Value

  1. No recurring license fees — the perpetual license does not expire, eliminating Lucullus’s annual renewal burden
  2. No Oracle tax — zero database licensing and zero DBA labor
  3. Paid support is optional and tiered — no forced bundling
  4. Predictable budgeting — one-time license + optional support
  5. No “license hostage” risk — a lapsed contract never locks you out of your own system

11. Industry Fit Analysis

Biotech (Cell Culture, Fermentation)

CriterionLucullus PIMSQB ControlWinner
Multi-vendor bioreactor support★★★★★★★★★Lucullus
Turnkey lab automation★★★★★★★★QB Control
Cross-experiment data analytics★★★★★★★★Lucullus
Time to first experiment★★★★★★★★QB Control
Automated sampling★★★★★ (Numera)★★★★ (QB Syringe + Selector Valve)Lucullus
Cost per bioreactor setup★★★★★★★★QB Control

Pharmaceuticals (Process Development)

CriterionLucullus PIMSQB ControlWinner
DoE integration★★★★★★★Lucullus
Regulatory validation effort★★★ (GAMP 5)★★★★★ (GAMP 4)QB Control
Data integrity for submissions★★★★★★★★★Lucullus
Electronic signatures today★★★★★★Lucullus
Recipe management flexibility★★★★★★★★★QB Control
Enterprise scalability★★★★★★★Lucullus

Cosmetics & Food/Beverage

CriterionLucullus PIMSQB ControlWinner
Small batch flexibility★★★★★★★★QB Control
Setup simplicity★★★★★★★QB Control
Hardware cost★★★★★★★QB Control
IT overhead★★★★★★★QB Control

Academic / Research

CriterionLucullus PIMSQB ControlWinner
Budget compatibility★★★★★★★QB Control
Student ease of use★★★★★★★★QB Control
Data analysis tools★★★★★★★★Lucullus
No IT department needed★★★★★★★QB Control
Teaching lab scalability★★★★★★★★QB Control

Industry Decision Guide

  • Biotech R&D / Process Development: Lucullus preferred IF DoE and cross-experiment analytics are the #1 priority; QB preferred IF rapid setup, compliance burden, and unified hardware control matter more.
  • CDMOs: QB wins for dedicated client lines with standardized vessels (fast changeover, perpetual licensing, no Oracle admin); Lucullus wins where vendor-agnostic breadth across many client bioreactors is essential.
  • Academic Research: QB wins — no IT department, plug-and-play teaching labs.
  • Cosmetics & Fine Chemicals: QB wins — small batches, simple deployment, cost-effective.
  • GMP Scale-Up: Lucullus can complement QB — Lucullus for historical data aggregation and DoE, QB for real-time control and stainless-steel pilot cells via PLC.

12. What QB Control Can Replace

Full Replacement Scenarios

QB Control can fully replace Lucullus PIMS when:

  • New greenfield lab — building from scratch with no legacy equipment. Value: unified hardware + software, days vs. weeks setup, no Oracle, no integrator.
  • Small R&D lab (1–6 bioreactors) — where Lucullus’s analytics breadth is not the priority. Value: turnkey control, perpetual license, zero DBA.
  • Academic / teaching lab — budget-sensitive, simplicity over analytical depth. Value: browser UI, no IT overhead, modular hardware.
  • Pilot facility with standardized vessels — all vessels on QB hardware. Value: one vendor, lower TCO, native sensors.
  • Startup biotech — rapid setup, minimal IT, maximum operational speed. Value: unbox and run.
  • Lab with retrofittable OPC-UA equipment — Sartorius and other OPC-UA bioreactors. Value: QB’s OPC-UA connector controls third-party hardware as a modern replacement control platform.
  • Stainless-steel pilot cell with an existing PLC (new)Value: deploy QB Control on an industrial PC and integrate the PLC over OPC-UA, reusing field hardware.

Partial Replacement Scenarios

QB Control can replace specific aspects while Lucullus handles others:

  • New vessel additions — run new vessels on QB Control while legacy vessels remain on Lucullus
  • Satellite labs — QB Control for smaller satellite operations, Lucullus for the main facility
  • Real-time control layer — QB handles SCADA control while Lucullus retains historical data warehousing and DoE
  • Prototyping / rapid iteration — QB for early-stage work, transfer to Lucullus for formal data studies

Not a Replacement For

QB Control is not designed to replace Lucullus PIMS in:

  • Enterprise multi-site deployments — where a centralized Oracle data warehouse is essential
  • Existing installations with dozens of drivers — where Lucullus’s vendor integration library (including non-OPC equipment) is already established
  • DoE-heavy process development — where Lucullus’s native DoE tooling provides irreplaceable value
  • Numera-dependent workflows — where Securecell’s automated sampling/sample-prep hardware is deeply integrated
  • Cross-experiment analytics at scale — where unlimited Oracle SQL querying across hundreds of historical runs is core

13. Where QB Control Creates Superior Value

13.1 Value Summary

Each pillar is detailed in the section noted; in brief, QB Control delivers:

  • No external database dependency — an embedded data store on the host replaces Lucullus’s Oracle requirement, eliminating DB licensing, DBA labor, and database-failure risk (§3).
  • Unified hardware + software, single vendor — QB Systems builds the host, the modular devices, and all software, so one vendor owns the whole stack and the support for it (§3).
  • Unified SCADA control + process data in one platform — real-time control and batch data run on the same host, versus Lucullus being a data/PIMS layer on top of separate controllers (§6).
  • No driver development — QB Modules auto-discover natively and the OPC-UA connector monitors and controls third-party equipment, with no per-device drivers, OPC licensing, or gateways (§5).
  • Zero-integrator self-service — unbox, connect PoE, auto-discover, and run from any browser; perpetual licensing with no Oracle tax or vendor lock-in (§7, §10).
  • Modern, open integration and right-sized governance — native REST, MQTT, SQL, MTP, and OPC-UA, plus GAMP 5 Category 4 (~50–70% less validation), P-Stop/E-Stop, Safe Position Logic, and a mandatory pre-execution checklist + Validator (§5, §9).

14. Gaps & Limitations

Lucullus Capabilities Not Available (or Weaker) in QB Control

CapabilityLucullus PIMSQB ControlImpact
Cross-experiment analyticsOracle-powered multi-run comparison/overlay across hundreds of runsPer-process graphs + CSV exportHigh
Design of Experiments (DoE)Native 3rd-party DoE integrationExport via REST/CSV to external toolsHigh
Multi-vendor breadth (non-OPC)25+ years of drivers, including legacy non-OPC equipmentOPC-UA connector reaches OPC-UA devices onlyHigh
Enterprise multi-siteCentralized Oracle data harmonization across sitesSingle-site (networkable)High
Numera automated samplingBest-in-class sample prep (filtration, dilution)Native alternative (Syringe Pump + Selector Valve)Medium
Amphora multi-feedDedicated gravimetric single/multi-feed stationQB Multiscale + QB Pump (native alternative)Medium
Media managementAutomated media creation + raw-material trackingManual via InventoryMedium
Sample managementBarcode tracking + at-line analyzer retrievalManual via InventoryMedium
Electronic signaturesSupported todayOn roadmap (Q3 2026)High for regulated production today
Established installed base25+ years, deployed at enterprise scaleNewer, lab-to-pilot focusMedium

Honest Assessment of QB Control Limitations

  1. Cross-experiment analytics depth — Lucullus’s Oracle backbone enables unlimited querying and overlay across hundreds of historical runs; QB exports data for external analysis but is not a data-warehouse platform
  2. No native DoE — design-of-experiments planning is not a QB Control feature; data must be exported to external DoE tools
  3. Multi-vendor breadth — QB reaches third-party hardware via OPC-UA; legacy non-OPC equipment still needs Lucullus drivers
  4. No enterprise multi-site warehouse — QB is single-site (networkable), not a global data-harmonization layer
  5. No electronic signatures yet — 21 CFR Part 11 conformance is partial until the Q3 2026 release
  6. Media / sample management — automated media creation and barcode-based sample lifecycle management are Lucullus-only workflows
  7. Liquid-handling focus — QB Control does not address gas-phase, solid-phase, or complex hybrid processes

For a lab that already runs Lucullus with Numera and 10+ multi-vendor bioreactors, switching wholesale to QB Control would mean replacing process hardware — an unrealistic proposition. Lucullus’s strength is being the software backbone for heterogeneous, established labs. QB Control wins when starting fresh, when cost and IT simplicity matter, when a unified platform is the goal, or when retrofitting OPC-UA-enabled hardware.


15. Migration & Replacement Scenarios

Scenario A: Greenfield Lab (New Biotech Startup)

Recommendation: QB Control. New company, no legacy equipment, 4–8 bioreactors for cell-culture process development. Single order from QB Systems (everything included), $0 software/Oracle add-on, plug-and-play setup in days vs. weeks, ~60–70% lower total investment than a multi-vendor Lucullus build. No migration, no legacy.

Scenario B: Lab Expansion (Existing Lucullus Customer)

Recommendation: QB Control in parallel for new vessels. A pharma R&D lab runs Lucullus on 6 Applikon bioreactors and wants 4 more for a new project. Add QB Control systems (plug-and-play, perpetual license, $60K–85K hardware) for the independent new project rather than buying more controllers and extending the Oracle schema. Keep Lucullus for the existing fleet’s data continuity; export QB data via REST API/CSV where aggregation is needed. Best if the new project is independent and budget-conscious.

Scenario C: Academic Teaching Lab

Recommendation: QB Control (full replacement). A university needs 6 benchtop bioreactors for teaching. Lucullus’s minimum viable setup carries Oracle, Windows Server, and DBA/network admin burden; QB Control runs in any browser on any laptop with no IT support, intuitive auto-generated P&IDs, and firmware-only maintenance — at materially lower cost and a gentler learning curve for students.

Scenario D: Retrofit of OPC-UA-Enabled Bioreactors

Recommendation: QB Control via the OPC-UA connector. A lab has Sartorius (or other OPC-UA) bioreactors with dated control interfaces. Deploy QB Control and use the OPC-UA connector to monitor and control the existing equipment, gaining a modern browser UI, Services Catalog, centralized multi-processing, and built-in compliance modules — without replacing working hardware or commissioning Lucullus drivers.

Scenario E: Stainless-Steel Pilot Cell with an Existing PLC (new)

Recommendation: QB Control on an industrial PC. Deploy QB Control on an industrial PC, integrate the existing PLC (Wago/Siemens/Beckhoff) over OPC-UA via the OPC UA Connector, and keep the field instruments. Value: SCADA-class supervisory control and recipes without Oracle, driver development, or integrator re-engineering — and without a software-only PIMS layer bolted on top.

Scenario F: CDMO (Contract Development & Manufacturing)

Recommendation: mixed. For dedicated client lines with standardized vessels, QB Control wins — rapid setup/teardown, process import/export + device mapping for fast replication, perpetual licensing, no Oracle admin between campaigns. Where the CDMO must connect to many clients’ different (and sometimes non-OPC) bioreactors and harmonize all data centrally, Lucullus’s vendor-agnostic breadth is the better fit — and the two can coexist.

Coexistence Architecture

QB Control and Lucullus can coexist in a hybrid architecture:

  • QB handles real-time bioreactor control — SCADA layer: monitoring, recipe execution, setpoint management, multi-process orchestration
  • Lucullus aggregates data from QB + other sources — PIMS layer: historical warehousing, cross-experiment analytics, DoE-tool integration via REST API or OPC-UA
  • Realistic hybrid where QB replaces Lucullus’s control functions while Lucullus retains data warehousing and advanced analytics

Customers can migrate incrementally: run QB for new processes, stream data to Lucullus for aggregation, and eventually retire Lucullus’s control layer while preserving its data repository.

Migration Risk Assessment

Risk FactorImpactMitigation
Historical data lossHigh — Oracle DB not directly portableExport via Lucullus REST API or Oracle dump before migration; archive on shared storage
Driver / OPC incompatibilityMedium — existing OPC configs won’t transferQB auto-discovers modules; OPC-UA enables integration with third-party legacy bioreactors
Staff retrainingLow — QB browser UI simpler than Lucullus1–2 day QB training vs. longer Lucullus onboarding; self-paced QB Systems Online Portal
Recipe re-implementationMedium — Lucullus recipes must be rebuiltQB Services Catalog provides ~40 pre-built strategies; most logic recreated visually via drag-and-drop
Regulatory re-validationMedium — new system requires IQ/OQ/PQGAMP Category 4 reduces effort 50–70% vs. Lucullus Category 5

16. Competitive Positioning Strategy

Positioning Statement

QB Control is not trying to be Lucullus. Lucullus PIMS is the industry’s most established bioprocess data-integration layer — a universal translator for every bioreactor language, with deep cross-experiment analytics and DoE. But that translation layer comes at a cost: Oracle databases, Windows servers, custom drivers, and system integrators that add weeks and hundreds of thousands of dollars to every deployment. When you are building a new lab, modernizing legacy equipment, or expanding with standardized vessels, you do not need a universal translator — you need hardware and software that speak the same language natively. QB Control delivers a unified platform with ~40 pre-built services, plug-and-play deployment, an OPC-UA connector for existing equipment, an industrial-PC path for stainless-steel PLC systems, 50–70% less validation effort, and 58–78% lower total cost.

Key Sales Arguments Against Lucullus

Lucullus Pain PointQB Control AdvantageEvidence
”Every new device needs a driver — weeks of work”Plug-and-play auto-discovery; OPC-UA for third-partyMinutes vs. weeks
”Oracle DBA and licensing cost us every year”Embedded data store — zero DBA, zero DB licensingNo Oracle tax
”We pay an integrator for every change”Self-service — visual no-code recipe designer + Services Catalog$0 integrator
”Validation took months under Category 5”GAMP 5 Category 450–70% less validation
”Control and data live in two different systems”Unified SCADA + PIMS on one hostSingle pane of glass
”Switching a control strategy means reconfiguring controllers”Swap a service templateMinutes, not days
”Our Sartorius bioreactors have a dated interface”OPC-UA connector controls them as a modern retrofitNo new hardware
”We have a stainless-steel pilot with a PLC”Industrial-PC deployment over OPC-UA (new)Reuse field hardware
”License renewals and upgrades keep escalating”Perpetual license — buy onceNo recurring fees

When NOT to Position Against Lucullus PIMS

Do not propose QB Control as a replacement for Lucullus when the client needs:

  1. 50+ bioreactors from multiple vendors already on Lucullus — switching cost is prohibitive; position QB for new standalone vessels only
  2. Enterprise multi-site data harmonization — Lucullus Enterprise with a centralized Oracle warehouse is the right tool
  3. DoE-driven process development as the core workflow — Lucullus’s native DoE integration is genuinely superior
  4. Cross-experiment analytics across hundreds of historical runs — Oracle SQL querying is Lucullus’s core strength
  5. Numera automated sampling deeply embedded — replacing Numera with QB sampling may not be acceptable
  6. Electronic signatures on an active IND today — defer until QB Control’s Q3 2026 e-signature release
  7. Connection to legacy non-OPC multi-vendor hardware — Lucullus’s driver breadth covers what QB’s OPC-UA reach cannot

In these cases, position QB Control as complementary to Lucullus — QB for real-time control and new/stainless-steel cells, Lucullus for data warehousing, DoE, and enterprise analytics — bridged over OPC-UA/REST.


17. Feature-by-Feature Matrix

#FeatureLucullus PIMSQB ControlQB AdvantageNotes
CORE CONTROL
1Real-time process control◐ (data layer; control via controllers)★★★★★QB: unified SCADA + PIMS
2Mixer/agitator control★★★★ (via controller)★★★★★QB native agitator modules (up to 6 vessels)
3Pump control★★★★ (via controller)★★★★★QB: 4 pump types native + SmartPump OPC
4Sampler control★★★★★ (Numera)★★★★Numera: sample prep, filtration, dilution
5Gas flow control★★★★ (via controller)★★★★★QB: native mass flow controller
6Temperature control★★★★ (via controller)★★★★★QB Thermo + PID service
7pH control★★★★ (via controller)★★★★★QB: CO₂, acid, or base+acid options
8Dissolved oxygen control★★★★ (via controller)★★★★Comparable (QB Gasflow + Multisensor)
9Scale/weight measurement★★★★ (via controller)★★★★★QB: native multiscale (6 channels)
10Foam detection★★★★ (via controller)★★★★★QB: native optical sensor
11LED/light control★★★★★QB: native photobioreactor lighting
PARALLEL PROCESSING
12Multi-bioreactor parallel★★★★★★★★★Lucullus: practically unlimited at Enterprise
13Centralized multi-processing★★ (aggregates controllers)★★★★★QB: all processes on one host
14Sequential campaign queuing★★★★★★★★QB: Pending queue + auto-stop (new)
15Auto-generated P&ID per process★★ (manual HMI)★★★★★QB auto-generates; Lucullus manual
16Process import/export + device mapping★★★★★★★★QB: one-click replication + remap
17Multi-user concurrent access★★★★★★★★QB: any browser; Lucullus: licensed seats
RECIPE, BATCH & SERVICES
18Recipe management★★★★★★★★★Lucullus event-based; QB visual
19Visual drag-and-drop designer★★★★★★★★QB: no-code DAG-style flow
20Recipe versioning★★★★★★★★QB: Draft→Verified→Validated→Hold→Archived
21Services Catalog★★★★★QB: ~40 services across 10 categories; Lucullus: none
22Service Profiles (reusable params)★★★★★QB: grouped/atomic + portable import/export
23Variables / Timer / Manual blocks★★★★★★★★QB: unified block library (new)
24Strategy switching speed★★★★★★★QB: swap service in minutes
25Recipe import/export★★★★★★★★★QB: cross-installation sharing
26Process import/export★★★★★★★★QB: complete process config + device mapping
27Pre-execution safety checklist★★★★★★★★QB: mandatory + Validator (system-enforced)
28Batch/Executions tracking★★★★★★★★★QB: dedicated Batch + Executions Boards
29Event-based control★★★★★★★★★Lucullus: sophisticated triggers + Numera
DATA MANAGEMENT & ANALYTICS
30Centralized database★★★★★ (Oracle)★★★ (embedded data store)Lucullus: enterprise-grade warehouse
31Cross-experiment analytics★★★★★★★Lucullus: core differentiator
32Real-time process graphs★★★★★★★★★QB: per-process live signals
33Historical data views★★★★★★★★★Lucullus: Oracle-powered queries
34Data export (CSV, PDF)★★★★★★★★★Both support standard exports
35Design of Experiments (DoE)★★★★★Lucullus only
36Media management★★★★★Lucullus: automated media creation
37Sample management★★★★★Lucullus: barcoding + at-line analyzers
INTEGRATION
38OPC UA★★★★ (data exchange)★★★★★QB: native + dedicated Connector, full control
39Multi-vendor bioreactor support★★★★★★★★★Lucullus: broader driver library; QB: OPC-UA reach
40REST API★★★★★★★★★Both provide REST API
41MQTT★★★★★★★QB: native
42SQL access★★★★★ (Oracle SQL)★★★★Lucullus: full Oracle power
43MTP support★★★★QB: plug-and-produce (new)
44LDAP/AD SSO★★★★★★★★QB: native LDAP/AD
45PLC reuse (Wago/Siemens/Beckhoff)★★★ (via drivers)★★★★★QB: industrial-PC deployment (new)
COMPLIANCE & SECURITY
46FDA 21 CFR Part 11★★★★★★★★⚠️Lucullus e-sigs today; QB partial (no e-sigs yet)
47GAMP 5 classificationCategory 5 (custom)Category 4QB: 50–70% less validation
48Electronic signatures★★★★★★⚠️Lucullus today; QB roadmap Q3 2026
49ISA-18.2 alarm management★★★★★★★★QB: documented conformance
50Audit trail★★★★ (Oracle logs)★★★★★QB: granular per-module module
51Role-based access control★★★★★★★★QB: granular per-action RBAC
52Safe Position Logic (GMP)★★★★★★★★QB: built-in configurable feature
53Calibration management★★ (vendor tools)★★★★★QB: integrated calibration module
DEPLOYMENT & OPERATIONS
54Installation time★★ (hours–days)★★★★★QB: browser-based, no install
55IT infrastructure required★★ (Windows + Oracle + network)★★★★★QB: host + PoE cables
56Training requirement★★★ (formal courses)★★★★★QB: self-paced online portal
57System integrator dependency★★ (often needed)★★★★★QB: $0, self-service
58Remote access★★★ (VPN + RDP)★★★★★QB: secure VPN + QR setup (new)
59Health monitoring dashboard★★★★★★★★QB: consolidated module/host health (new)
COST & LICENSING
60Initial investment★★★★★★★58–78% lower (4-bioreactor)
615-year TCO★★★★★★★$75K–110K vs. $265K–345K
62License model★★★★★★★QB perpetual; Lucullus recurring
63Oracle / DB licensing★★★★★★★QB: none
64Vendor lock-in★★★★★★★QB: open ecosystem
HARDWARE
65Own hardware ecosystem★★★★★QB: native PoE modules
66Native Hamilton / Mettler Toledo sensors★★★★★★★★QB: direct via QB Multisensor
67Automated sampling hardware★★★★★ (Numera)★★★★Numera best-in-class for sample prep
68Photobioreactor lighting★★★★QB: QB Light, native

Summary Scores by Category

CategoryLucullus PIMSQB ControlWinner
Core Control3.64.7QB Control
Parallel Processing3.44.7QB Control
Recipe, Batch & Services3.44.9QB Control
Data Management & Analytics4.63.5Lucullus (Oracle, DoE, cross-experiment)
Integration3.54.7QB Control
Compliance & Security3.44.5QB Control (GAMP Cat 4; e-sigs trail Lucullus)
Deployment & Operations2.45.0QB Control

Overall: QB Control wins in 6 of 7 categories for the target lab-to-pilot market. With its unified recipe block library, sequential auto-stop campaigns, native MTP, OPC-UA connector, secure remote access, Health Monitoring, and the industrial-PC deployment path, QB Control leads decisively in architecture, deployment, recipe/services, integration, compliance burden, and cost. Lucullus retains a strong lead in data management — Oracle-powered cross-experiment analytics, native DoE, and enterprise multi-site harmonization — making it the better choice for data-intensive process development and established heterogeneous fleets. Lucullus also leads on electronic signatures until QB Control’s Q3 2026 release.

Scoring reflects lab-to-pilot scale bioprocessing scenarios. Lucullus would score higher for enterprise multi-site and cross-experiment analytics use cases.


Recent QB Control Enhancements (current release)

The current QB Control release adds the capabilities referenced in this comparison (reflecting the current QB Control release):

  • Batch scheduling — recurring (daily / weekly / interval) or one-time run schedules per batch, with a calendar view, named schedules, skip-on-conflict handling, and matching audit-trail records.
  • Recipe portability — a recipe can be reassigned to a different process, automatically remapping its devices and services so a proven design moves between similar lines instead of being rebuilt.
  • Equipment changes from the P&ID — lab equipment can be added directly in the P&ID editor (auto-creating the matching inventory and process records), with freeform note elements and anchor-point piping connections; lab equipment can also be added or removed on already-deployed processes without creating a new process version.
  • Embedded OPC UA server — the OPC UA Connector can now run its own embedded OPC UA server, letting external OPC UA clients (e.g., MES, historians) read from QB Control directly.
  • Expanded catalog — six additional tangential-flow (cross-flow) filtration services and six new lab-equipment types (including cooling chamber, filter cassette, hollow-fiber filter, and vials holder).
  • Operations & safety — an alarm watchdog reconciling alarm state against live equipment values every 30 seconds; calibration that reserves the device during calibration (blocking conflicting operations); Protect / Interlock faceplate safeguards; audit-trail events filtered to the active license; and license-aware controls shown with explanatory tooltips.
  • Usability — an in-app Help section with guided walkthroughs and searchable content across every module; search across inventory tables; and Health Monitoring showing system start time and uptime.

Versions compared. This comparison is between QB Control (release 6.x, per the current QB Control release notes) and Securecell Lucullus® version 24.x (current release; 2024 version-numbering scheme). Feature statements in this document refer to these versions.

Accuracy and currency. The information provided in this comparison is based on publicly available data gathered on 20 July 2026. While we strive to keep this information accurate and up to date, product features, pricing, and terms are subject to change by the respective manufacturers. We make no warranties regarding the absolute accuracy of the competitor data, and a later release may add, change, or remove capabilities described here.

Trademarks. All trademarks, logos, and brand names are the property of their respective owners. All company, product, and service names used in this document are for identification and comparison purposes only, and use of these names, trademarks, and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Lucullus®, Numera®, and Amphora® are trademarks of Securecell AG; Getinge® is a trademark of Getinge AB. QB Control and QB Systems are brands of A4BEE Sp. z o.o.

Transparency note. This comparison is prepared, owned, and operated by A4BEE Sp. z o.o., the creators of QB Systems and QB Control. It was created to highlight how our product differs from other options on the market, based on objective, verifiable features.

Purpose and limitation of liability. This comparison is provided for informational and educational purposes only, to help readers build knowledge of the options available to them. It is not an assessment, audit, ranking, benchmark, or endorsement of the technical expertise, quality, safety, or performance of Securecell Lucullus® or its vendor. A4BEE Sp. z o.o. assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content, nor for any decisions made based on this information; any reliance on the comparison is at the reader’s own risk.

Comparative-advertising basis. This document is intended to align with applicable comparative-advertising and fair-use rules, including EU Directive 2006/114/EC and US nominative-fair-use principles: it compares products intended for the same needs, relies on material, relevant, verifiable, and representative features, and is not intended to mislead or to denigrate any competitor. Where a competitor capability could not be verified from public sources, it is identified as such. If you believe any statement is inaccurate or out of date, please contact [email protected] and it will be reviewed and corrected promptly.

Assumptions

To keep the comparison transparent and fair, the following assumptions and estimates were applied:

  • Third-party capabilities are interpreted from public vendor datasheets, brochures, manuals, and websites current at the analysis date. Where a capability was not clearly documented publicly, it is described as such (“not clearly documented,” “appears limited,” etc.) rather than asserted or denied.
  • Competitor pricing and total-cost-of-ownership figures are indicative estimates derived from public information and typical configurations — not vendor quotations or list prices.
  • QB Control reference figures are indicative, based on past quotations, and do not constitute a specific priced offer.
  • The comparison assumes a lab-to-pilot bioprocessing context (roughly 150 mL–50 L, plus stainless-steel pilot/production via PLC over OPC-UA); conclusions may differ at large multi-train production scale.
  • “QB Control” reflects the current released version at the analysis date; third-party products reflect the newest versions identified in public sources.

Sources

QB Control capabilities referenced in this document reflect QB Control release 6.x (current release).

Product and brand names listed below are trademarks of their respective owners (attributed in the Legal Notice & Disclaimer) and are used here for identification and comparison purposes only.

  1. Securecell AG — Lucullus® SCADA Software
  2. Getinge — Lucullus® PIMS Product Page
  3. Securecell — Event-Based Process Control
  4. Securecell — IntegraOne Solution
  5. Securecell — Numera® & Lucullus® PAT Integration
  6. Securecell — Amphora® Multi-Feed Control
  7. Securecell — Getinge Partnership (10 Years)
  8. Securecell — Lucullus® REST API (community library)
  9. Securecell — TU Wien Case Study
  10. ISA-88 Batch Control Standard (ISA)
  11. ISA-18.2 Alarm Management Standard (ISA)
  12. FDA 21 CFR Part 11 — Electronic Records & Signatures
  13. EU Annex 11 — Computerised Systems (EudraLex Vol. 4)

Analysis prepared July 2026 | Version 1.0 (v1-July) | QB Systems vs. Lucullus PIMS competitive positioning QB Systems — Flexible. Innovative. Limitless. | A product brand of A4BEE Sp. z o.o. | https://qb.systems

← All comparisons

Curious to see how it works?

Schedule a demo. See how to accelerate and automate your bioprocesses.

Contact us